LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Tiverton wind project slammed by opponents 

Credit:  By TIM FAULKNER/ecoRI News staff, www.ecori.org ~~

PROVIDENCE – Opposition to the state’s largest proposed wind turbine project is being fueled by two words: “eminent domain.”

The term has raised the ire of political groups and government skeptics in recent months, as the East Bay Energy Consortium (EBEC) has pushed for legislation to establish itself as a public-private state agency.

During a May 2 Statehouse hearing, political ideologues were quick to dispel the project as a land-grabbing threat to free society. Lisa Blais of Ocean State Tea Party in Action said if given the special designation EBEC would become “a dangerous quasi-government agency that is answerable to no one.”

Blais and other opponents of the bill claimed state representatives and town/city councils within the nine-community EBEC alliance were withdrawing support for the bill after learning about the eminent domain clause.

EBEC has said it is simply seeking eminent domain authority out of necessity, and has insisted there is no plan to take land. Having the privilege allows EBEC to assume all liability for the project and with it the ability to issue municipal bonds, which will be needed to fund the proposed $50 million to $60 million wind project in Tiverton.

EBEC was started in 2009 as a first-of-its-kind regional collaboration to establish local energy projects. By pooling new renewable energy incentives into a single project, each city and town involved intends to cut energy costs and reduce its reliance on volatile fossil-fuel prices.

Over the course of monthly meetings, representatives from nine member communities – East Providence, Barrington, Warren, Bristol, Newport, Portsmouth, Middletown, Little Compton and Tiverton – created a proposal for a 10-12 turbine wind farm at the Tiverton Industrial Park. The site is ideal for its wind speed and access to electric transmission lines, according to the EBEC. Funding for the planning and studies has so far come from the state Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and The Rhode Island Foundation.

An initial study estimated annual payments of $200,000 to each EBEC community with at least another $350,000 paid to Tiverton for hosting the wind project.

Newport City Counci member Jeanne-Marie Napolitano, chairwoman of the EBEC, has said the consortium’s primary goal is cutting costs, not taking land. “We all definitely want to save some money for ratepayers and taxpayers,” she said during an April 5 House hearing.

Tiverton is a long way from approving the EBEC proposal, as it also considers other privately funded renewable energy projects on the 650-acre site. Tiverton Town Council member David Nelson said the EBEC project would be a difficult sell if eminent domain was part of the deal. “In it’s current form, it would not pass the council today,” he said.

Former EBEC vice chairman Andy Shapiro, who now works for Apex Wind, one of the private developers vying to build the project, suspects the EBEC plan will fail as details of the bill are reviewed.

“I think EBEC will have a hard time holding on to the municipalities when they find out what’s in the bill,” Shapiro said.

Do to a lack of quorum, the Senate hearing was continued until another date. The House bill is also being held in committee.

Source:  By TIM FAULKNER/ecoRI News staff, www.ecori.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky