[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Battle grows over extending tax breaks for wind energy producers  

Credit:  By Alicia Acuna, Fox News, www.foxnews.com 1 May 2012 ~~

Federal lawmakers warn that states stand to lose wind industry jobs if Congress fails to pass legislation to extend the federal tax break for wind energy producers, known as the production tax credit, which is due to expire at the end of this year.

“We’re just not doing our job,’ Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., said. “We need to get after it.”

Bennet and fellow Colorado Democratic Sen. Mark Udall are both concerned that their state alone could lose 6,000 jobs. And according to the American Wind Energy Association, as many as 37,000 manufacturing jobs could be at risk nationwide.

The producer credit helps offset the cost of electricity production during a wind farm’s first 10 years. It came about in 1992 when the industry was still finding its legs. It’s also something that must be renewed periodically by Congress.

Proponents say if lawmakers wait until the end of 2012 to get this done, the industry risks losing out on potential wind development projects. The thinking being that if a company is considering a new contract, it may hold back. If that happens, then it sets off a domino effect where wind turbine manufacturers and others in the supply chain lose work.

Bennet has co-sponsored a bill in the Senate that would give the credit a two-year extension. The House version calls for four years. Both are moving slowly. In an effort to get it done sooner rather than later, Bennet also has put forward an amendment with a plan to pay for the program, with the help of some Republicans.

“I think that in the overall scheme of things in Washington where the place… (has) really become, I call it ‘the land of flickering lights’, because the standard of the success there is where we kept the lights on for another two months, and kept the government running for another two months.”

Not everyone thinks wind is worth the effort, or the estimated $2 billion to $4 billion it could cost next year.

Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., opposes the the production tax credit. He says he doesn’t want taxpayers to be forced to fork over money to prop up the industry.

“At some point wind needs to stand on its own two feet,” Lamborn said. “And when it comes to receiving taxpayer subsidies … it doesn’t seem to get to the point where it can stand on its own.” He adds that his hope is this alternate energy source finds its way to give consumers more options.

Over the last 20 years, the wind industry has grown to provide on average about 3 percent of power grid electricity nationwide. In some states, it makes up almost a quarter.

“Washington does not do a good job of picking winners and losers. In fact, it usually picks losers,” Lamborn said.

In response, Bennet’s office says, “Many opponents of the wind tax support federal subsidies for other energy industries, including some for the largest oil companies.”

The production tax credit helps developers of wind farms, which power the businesses of companies like Vestasm a wind turbine manufacturer with production and research located in Colorado. The company has indicated layoffs could be become a reality without the extension.

Tony Knopp, the general manager for Vestas Towers, recently made a rare media appearance and explained the value of America’s investment in this renewable.

“We don’t use water in our process, we don’t have to worry about anything to do with water, and water shortages,” he said. That was an apparent reference to hydraulic fracturing, which is used in to extract oil and gas from the ground.

Bennet says this is still an emerging industry and provides jobs manufacturing jobs his and other states can’t afford to lose.

Source:  By Alicia Acuna, Fox News, www.foxnews.com 1 May 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.