[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Town of Prattsburgh vs. Ecogen legal battle 

Credit:  Reported by: Rebecca Solomon, WETM, www.wetmtv.com 30 April 2012 ~~

The Town of Prattsburgh moves forward Monday in a legal dispute against wind developer Ecogen.

Council members passed a motion to fight a stay against Ecogen and for Supreme Court Justice John Ark to clarify the 168 days to establish the company’s vested rights to the project.

This motion is part of a long standing legal battle between the town and Ecogen. Ecogen says the 168 period hasn’t started yet.

So Monday’s motion means Judge Ark can look into whether or not the 168 have passed and if that’s the case, the town would be in favor for negotiations with having the turbines in the town.

Town supervisor, Lenny McConnell, voted against the motion. He says he’s concerned with the litigation costs. The town has already spent $120,000 on the case.

Filing the motion will add $10,000 and continuing with the entire process will cost another $50,000.

McConnell says, “We’re here to work together and the town can’t afford to go any further. It’s just costing so much money and we have got to come to terms with this.”

Some Prattsburgh neighbors we spoke with say it’s not worth the money and other’s say it’s worth the fight.

Lynn Kesselring says, “We’re wasting money. We have spent so much money. We have already got $125,000 into this, now another ten and talking about this 168 days, it was never in the original settlement- that’s the reason why Ecogen is fighting this.”

Carl Wahlstrom says, “It had to be passed. Judge Ark gave them 168 days to prove they were vested, over 4 years ago. The attorney for Ecogen said they had already purchased the turbines and then said they were getting investors in line to buy the turbines. How can we be holding them up if they already have the turbines?”

If the judge finds that Ecogen’s 168 period hasn’t started yet, the town essentially loses this appeal and they are right back to where they started.

Source:  Reported by: Rebecca Solomon, WETM, www.wetmtv.com 30 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky