[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

MOE seeks dismissal of Haldimand wind farm appeals  

Credit:  By Monte Sonnenberg, Simcoe Reformer, www.brantfordexpositor.ca 30 April 2012 ~~

HAGERVILLE – A hearing into a proposed wind-turbine project near Jarvis is tentatively scheduled for Hagersville at the end of the month.

The province’s Environmental Review Tribunal has pencilled in 10 days of testimony beginning May 28. The tribunal will confirm the appointment if several motions of dismissal are themselves dismissed at a preliminary hearing in Hagersville this Friday.

At issue is the 58-unit Summerhaven wind farm in west and central Haldimand. The Ministry of the Environment approved the Nextera development earlier this year.

Appealing the decision are Haldimand Wind Concerns and subsistence hunter Bill Monture of Six Nations. Several others were granted participant and observer status at a preliminary hearing in Hagersville Monday.

The tribunal has a mandate to hear challenges to projects that may pose a risk to human health, wildlife, plant life and the well-being of the environment.

MOE representative Nadine Harris signalled her intention Monday to have the appeals thrown out at Friday’s hearing. Harris and representatives for Nextera maintain that the appellants’ concerns fall outside the tribunal’s mandate.

There were several testy exchanges during Monday’s proceedings. Monture began by chiding the tribunal for setting up the hearing so that the appellants were speaking with their backs to the audience.

“I’m not accustomed to this,” said Monture, who was wearing a colourful feathered headdress. “We should turn the tables so we are at least facing the people. To me, speaking with my back to the people is disrespectful. To me, it is ignorant.”

Tribunal chair Heather Gibbs was flanked by co-adjudicators Robert Wright and Dirk Vanderbent. Gibbs told Monture that the proceedings were organized for the benefit of the tribunal and not the 40 seated in the gallery, many of whom voiced their displeasure when they couldn’t make out what the participants were saying. Gibbs finally agreed to re-arrange the tables during a break.

Peter Sleeman, of Port Dover, also took the tribunal to task for having too narrow a mandate. According to the rules, Sleeman said it was virtually impossible for anyone to provide input.

“Your focus is so narrow that ordinary folks can’t even address it,” he said. “I believe the onus that wind farms are not detrimental should be on the wind farm operators and not the poor farmers and ordinary people who have to live with them. Your focus is so narrow that ordinary folks can’t even speak to you.”

The Six Nations band council was granted permission at Monday’s hearing to present testimony. Lonnie Bomberry, director of land resources for Six Nations, said Canadian law requires developers to “consult and accommodate” First Nations on projects affecting their interests. Six Nations has an interest in the Summerhaven project, Bomberry said, because it will impact hunting rights on land covered under the Nanfan Treaty of 1701.

“It could be jobs in construction of the project,” Bomberry said. “Or permanent jobs in the running of the wind farm. It could be economic benefits to the community. Six Nations should benefit from their land and resources, just like everyone else.”

Norm Negus of Hagersville will also be allowed to testify. He will speak on the potential health consequences of living near high-voltage transmission lines.

Mike Meghar, a representative of the Canadian Gypsum Company of Hagersville, wanted to provide testimony on the location of mine shafts in the affected zone and the risk of a cave-in if a turbine is built on a weak spot. However, Meghar was told he did not require intervenor status to share this information with the relevant parties.

Source:  By Monte Sonnenberg, Simcoe Reformer, www.brantfordexpositor.ca 30 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.