[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cash offer ‘an insult’ 

Credit:  By Danielle VandenBrink, www.thewhig.com ~~

A company looking to build a controversial wind farm on Amherst Island has quietly offered Loyalist Township an payment of $7.5 million annually, the Whig-Standard has learned.

But the proposal doesn’t sit well with the head of a group opposed to the construction, who decried the payments as shameful.

Janet Grace, president of the Association for Protection of Amherst Island, said she believes the proposed payment is a response to mounting pressure from community members opposing the project.

The offer – which is conditional upon final approval from the province – would see the power company forward a voluntary payment of $7.5 million to Loyalist Township each year, beginning in 2014.

Sean Fairfield, senior manager of project planning for Algonquin Power, said the draft agreement is based on the capacity, or price per megawatt, of the 33-turbine wind farm.

The facility is expected to generate 247 megawatts of electricity annually.

“We want to build a partnership with the community,” Fairfield said. “Looking into our modelling, we felt ($7.5 million per year) was reasonable.

“We believe that offering this would help the municipality in relation to another project they may have.”

The draft agreement was presented to Loyalist Township council last month, but wasn’t released to the public until late last week.

The proposed money would be provided by the “Community Vibrancy Fund,” created by Windlectric Inc., a subsidiary of Algonquin Power.

Windlectric has proposed that 50% of the annual payment, or $3.75 million, be allocated to Amherst Island specifically.

When asked about criticism by some who call the proposed payment a bribe to the municipality, Fairfield said it is customary for the company to offer municipalities incentives.

“We try to partner up with various communities that we’re involved in,” he said. “We like to initiate these types of agreements in some form.”

“There’s so much community opposition to this project and I think that they’re feeling the heat a little bit,” she said. “It is very obvious that our community does not welcome this development.”

Opponents of the project have claimed the turbines will cause property values to decline, will destroy wildlife and cause negative health effects for those on the island.

“The bottom line is that Amherst Island is just too small of an island to be putting up this size of project,” Grace said. “It will completely blanket the island with wind turbines.”

Grace said the money offered to the municipality by the power company does not compare to the impact the project will have on the island.

“To sacrifice the quality of life for that amount of money is an insult,” she said.

Duncan Ashley, township councillor for Amherst Island, said council was presented with the offer with a request for it to remain confidential.

He said the potential contract was received in a closed session of council, and has been forwarded to lawyers for review.

Council is scheduled to discuss the contract with solicitors in another closed session on April 30, he said.

“We are looking for expert advice on what the agreement may mean,” Ashley said. “Is it an opportunity, is it a liability, does it compromise the municipality’s and council’s ability to represent the entire municipality and not just one Ward 1 on Amherst Island.

Amid criticism from opponents that the money is intended to influence councillors, Ashley said he prefers to reserve his judgment on the potential agreement until it is discussed with lawyers.

“The financial offer definitely muddies the waters,” he said. “I definitely want to find out from the experts what the prize or what the pitfalls of that offer are.”

Source:  By Danielle VandenBrink, www.thewhig.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky