LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

It’s time to think again over turbines 

Credit:  Ryan Crighton. Press and Journal, April 25, 2012 ~~

Nearly two-thirds of people in the north and north-east want a review of the Scottish Government’s controversial windfarm policies.

But an independent poll commissioned by the Press and Journal has also revealed that the majority of people – 59% – are in favour of wind energy.

This came on the day American billionaire Donald Trump will travel to the Scottish Parliament to tell MSPs the structures are “destroying Scotland”.

In Aberdeenshire – where there have been more than 800 wind turbine plans put forward in little over a year – planning chairman Peter Argyle has demanded a six-month moratorium amid fears the region is heading for a crisis.

And last night his concerns were backed by the P&J poll – with 62% of people supporting his call for a review of the national strategy.

However, the public are split on whether turbines are spoiling the landscape – with 50% saying yes, 49% saying no and 1% unsure.

And there is also a divide on whether too many have already been built, with 49% saying no, 47% saying yes and 4% undecided.

Mr Trump said last night: “The Scottish Government should listen to its people and protect tourism and the beautiful landscapes the world has come to love by immediately issuing a moratorium on all future turbine developments. Wind power is anything but efficient. If people knew the exorbitant cost of wind energy compared with other sources it would be not even be close.

Source:  Ryan Crighton. Press and Journal, April 25, 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky