[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbines need a separate noise standard 

Credit:  Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 24 April 2012 ~~

Gov. Mark Dayton is “too busy” to address a state policy that’s destroying Minnesotans’ health.

“We don’t have a noise standard that’s designed to work for turbines,” said Commissioner Paul Aasen, Dayton’s appointee to Minnesota’s Pollution Control Agency. Yet, the distance between an industrial wind turbine and your house is determined using the state’s noise standard.

Minnesota’s Department of Health recognized the link between wind turbine noise and human health problems in their award-winning 2009 study, “Public Health Impacts of Wind Turbines.” This department recommended the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission address turbine noise when determining the location of turbines.

Commerce’s Energy Facilities Permitting staff, who provide technical advice to the MPUC, acknowledge that the setback distance from homes is based on a noise standard that does not measure turbine noise. The MPUC continues to surround rural homes with 400-foot industrial turbines.

Minnesotans living close to industrial wind turbines commonly experience sleeplessness, ringing in the ears and chest pressure. Some wind companies “respond” to noise complaints by stating they “meet the state’s noise standard.” Others offered suffering residents a “white noise machine” in a failed attempt to mask turbine noise.

I’ve brought this issue to Gov. Dayton repeatedly for seven months. I’m told he is “very busy.”

If the goal is to destroy lives and reduce rural human habitation, Minnesota’s industrial wind mandate is succeeding.

Kristi Rosenquist

Source:  Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 24 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky