[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Suffolk astronomer says wind turbine will ruin stargazing  

Credit:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 24 April 2012 ~~

A Suffolk astronomer claims a proposed wind turbine near his observatories would ruin his scientific research.

Tom Boles, who works at home in Coddenham, searches for dying stars, or supernovae, and takes images of them.

He said vibrations from the proposed turbine at Coddenham Hall Farm would disrupt his computerised telescopes.

Officers at Mid Suffolk District Council are recommending planning permission for the turbine is approved. The farm was unavailable for comment.

Mr Boles has three research telescopes in two observatories in his garden, which would be 130m (142 yards) from the turbine.

Mr Boles said his research into supernovae has been used by most other major telescopes in the world and by scientists who work on measuring the expansion of the universe.

Blurred images

He said: “You get a constant vibration from these turbines which would build up small vibrations in my telescopes which would blur the images.

“It’s a lovely view [from the house], but the real worry is the observatory – it would just destroy my retirement if it went away.

“The council needs to consider the visual impact, the evidence of vibration and what they would be taking away from the scientific community if they closed this observatory down as it would be an end to my research.”

The proposed turbine hub would be 15.4m (16.8 yards) high and the blades would have a 21m (23 yards) diameter.

Coddenham Hall Farm was unavailable for comment while Mid Suffolk District Council said it would not talk ahead of the planning committee meeting on Wednesday.

In the council’s committee agenda, a planning officer said he was satisfied the turbine would not have an “unacceptable impact on the ongoing viable operation of the observatory”.

The council said it had received eight letters in support of the turbine and 38 objecting to it.

Source:  BBC News, www.bbc.co.uk 24 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.