[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

If wishes were horses…  

Credit:  Brainerd Dispatch, brainerddispatch.com 23 April 2012 ~~

If wishes were horses, legislators could pass renewable energy bills which ride rough shod over the Laws of Nature and Physics, but they can’t. If wishes were horses, wind and solar would have replaced one fossil fuel plant somewhere on earth, but they haven’t. Solar would be more than a fraction of 1 percent of our electric energy, and wind and solar combined would be more than one quad of the 100 quads of annual US energy consumption, but they aren’t. And there would be batteries with the capacity to step up when the sun doesn’t shine and the wind blows too little or too much, but there aren’t. We use natural gas and hydro for that.

Xcel Energy has a program called Windsource where you pay more, not less, to use wind power. The EIA reports that on a per unit of energy basis, subsidies to coal are $0.39; nuclear $1.79; for corn ethanol $20.37; wind $32.39; for solar $63.

We need more public transport; more efficient cars and light bulbs; and to continue support for renewables research. We don’t need premature projects like the $2 billion Ivanpah solar project in Nevada, or the $2 billion Cape Wind off Cape Cod. Neither will produce one tenth the output of Prairie Island nuclear, Xcel Energy’s lowest cost operating power source.

So when political candidates talk about the environment, think also about the economy where the rest of us cough up $7,500 for each wealthy buyer of an electric car. Or about Germany, where middle income power users pay so that wealthy home owners can decorate their roofs with solar panels.

If wishes were horses, it would be easy and cheap to replace fossil fuels, but it won’t be.

Rolf Westgard


Source:  Brainerd Dispatch, brainerddispatch.com 23 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.