[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Editorial off the mark in support for wind power  

Credit:  Maine Sunday Telegram, www.pressherald.com 22 April 2012 ~~

According to a recent Telegram editorial (“PUC made right call on wind power investment,” April 15), “From an environmental perspective, the benefits of expanded windpower are worth the costs.” Oh?

Those of us who have examined the cost/benefit ratio aren’t making that kind of blanket statement.

In fact, we’ve found it’s only worth the costs if you don’t know what those costs are.

For the fact that anyone still has to ask this, we can thank the Natural Resources Council of Maine and Angus King.

King has been a major player at NRCM for years, alternately with writing Maine’s expedited wind law, pushing it through the Legislature and setting up First Wind to profit from it.

This would be fine if it made environmental sense. But does it?

Does windpower reduce atmospheric carbon? No.

It can’t, because it doesn’t provide enough energy to replace other sources, so you must still run those other sources.

Plus, there’s the huge amount of pollution embedded in the construction process: New roads into wild places, trees destroyed (a major carbon sink), diesel and gas burned and pollution at the factory level.

All this to provide less energy than we can provide with conservation.

If the NRCM was doing its job, the rest of us wouldn’t need to still point this out.

Particularly shameful is NRCM’s silence on the topic of bird and bat deaths.

These are far worse than industry estimates.

With some birds, such as eagles, any deaths at all are illegal. Industry knows it has a looming problem here.

Again, they are getting cozy with environmental groups, crafting regulations that would give them immunity from prosecution in exchange for donations.

To quote John 8:32: “Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.” Let’s hope.

Does windpower reduce atmospheric carbon? No. It can’t, because it doesn’t provide enough enough energy to replace other sources, so you must still run those other sources.

Sally McGuire
Carthage

Source:  Maine Sunday Telegram, www.pressherald.com 22 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter