[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ill winds blow through huge UK wind project 

Credit:  By Peter Reina, with Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record, enr.construction.com 20 April 2012 ~~

The owner of one of the world’s largest offshore wind farms more than 20 kilometers off the coast of England, has lodged a large claim for delayed completion due to defective construction against the contractor, Fluor Corp.

The claim is reportedly at least as large as the one worth about $480 million that Fluor has already filed against the owner, Greater Gabbard Offshore Winds Ltd., also for delays over the 504-MW project in the outer Thames Estuary.

Originally set for completion by 2011, the wind farm is now not due to be fully operational until later this year, according to Edinburgh, Scotland-based utility SSE plc. SSE owns the project equally with the U.K. subsidiary of Germany’s RWE Innogy GmbH., Essen.

SSE attributes much of the delay to unspecified welding defects in the initial 52 of 140 large diameter steel tube foundations of the field’s turbines, set in water up to 32-meters deep. The steelwork forms a key part of Fluor’s $1.8-billion lump-sum, turnkey contract.

“We’re right, they’re wrong,” Fluor CEO David Seaton told ENR earlier this month. “Mediation is to start this summer on this. I’m confident in our technical positions relative to the claim.”

Fluor made provisions of $343 million for liabilities on the Greater Gabbard job in its 2010 financial results and another $60 million last year, according to company filings. Fluor’s claim volume reached $265 million at the end of 2011 and the meter is still running.

SSE first announced the discovery of welding problems in late 2009 after Fluor’s Netherlands-based subcontractor Seaway Heavy Lifting B.V., Zoetermeer, had started installing monopiles. The remaining monopiles went in during summer 2010.

Greater Gabbard’s monopiles are steel tubes up to 6.3-metres-dia and weighing nearly 700-tonnes. Individual monopiles were driven into the seabed to support a single turbine. Each monopile is topped with a transition piece which rises out of the water and forms a base for the turbine tower.

Following an investigation last October, SSE reported that some of 52 defective monopiles had been repaired before their installation. Other monopiles and all of the initial 52 transition pieces remained defective, the utility claimed.

Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. fabricated the monopiles and their transition pieces in China and shipped them to the Netherlands. Copenhagen-based Ramboll Group was the foundation designer.

The grouted interface between monopiles and transition pieces have caused problems with numerous North Sea wind power projects (ENR May 17, 2010, Pg. 14). But this grouting defect appears not be the main cause of delay on Greater Gabbard.

Fluor and Dublin-based renewable energy developer Airtricity Holding Ltd. had created Greater Gabbard Offshore Winds Ltd. more than a decade ago to develop and procure the project. The team retained ownership until it secured necessary permitting and procured financing and construction contracts.

Fluor then sold its interest in the project to SSE in May 2008 after all the contracts, including the turnkey agreement, were sealed. SSE then became sole owner after it had previously acquired Aitricity, but sold a 50% interest to RWE later that year.

Source:  By Peter Reina, with Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record, enr.construction.com 20 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky