[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Protecting our town  

Credit:  The Recorder, www.recorder.com 18 April 2012 ~~

Residents of Shelburne:

Citizens arranged for an impressive series of presentations at Memorial Hall in Shelburne Falls about industrial wind turbines. An expert in real estate estimated that property values in Shelburne Falls will decrease by at least 25 percent. That means the Buckland side stands to lose $23 million if wind turbines get built on Mount Massaemet.

Physics professor Dr. Ben Luce convinced me that the push for wind energy is terrible public policy because, in part, wind uses billions in public subsidies and threatens to eat up what little funds we have to put toward real viable energy solutions. He favors a serious “Manhattan Project” like conservation effort and small-scale solar as much better uses of the public’s money. Another talk was on the low-frequency sound that is driving people out of their homes in other parts of the state. Even if the “science” on the health effects of having a constant humming and drumming going into your ears, your body, and into ground itself is not yet conclusive, I am not willing to believe anyone who says it’s not a problem.

Recently, 46 residents of Shelburne have come up with a zoning bylaw change that would ban large turbines and left the business of regulating smaller ones to others who wish to do so. I am a little worn out after spending the last six months wondering whether I will be impacted by turbines less than a mile and a half from my house. I am asking the voters of Shelburne to vote “yes” on articles 17, 18 and 19 at Shelburne town meeting May 1. That’s the only sure way that the wind developer who just submitted new plans will be prevented from building on the mountain.

Buckland side
Shelburne Falls

Source:  The Recorder, www.recorder.com 18 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.