[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Local benefits of wind farm questioned 

Credit:  Imperial Valley Press, www.ivpressonline.com 18 April 2012 ~~

I am writing in response to your editorial on April 15 in which you support the Ocotillo Wind Energy facility, which would put 112 (or is it 155? Information about the project is still inconsistent), 440-foot wind turbines around the community of Ocotillo. The editorial ends by saying, “If unemployment was 10 to 12 percent here, if the median income was in the mid-$40,000s, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Our government officials could be more selective. That is reality. That is the truth.”

Yes, it is true that higher income communities are less likely to consider projects which will damage the environment than a low-income community. (Case in point: Ocotillo, the lowest-income community in a low-income county is repeatedly chosen for high-noise projects.) Here are a few other truths.

In communities all over the world where wind turbines have been built nearby, health problems have ensued. The victims include members of the Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay who live near the turbines in Campo. Complaints range from an inability to sleep and vertigo to cardiac problems.

The project is promising 350 jobs in construction. However in the public hearing when planning commissioner Dave Gaddis asked Glen Hodges , the representative of Pattern Energy, to guarantee 10 local jobs he refused, saying, “ I don’t want to overpromise and underdeliver sir.” While insisting that they wanted to hire locally, Mr. Hodges would only guarantee one local job.

With the potential end of the production tax credit for wind energy, and the low price of natural gas, there are serious questions about the viability of wind energy. According to an April 9 article in the online magazine Aol Energy, Hunter Armistead, executive director at Pattern Energy paints a bright picture of the wind energy business. However he adds, “But there are going to be three to four train wrecks in the industry to figure out where the industry is. But that creates opportunity.”

Pattern Energy emerged when Babcock and Brown, an Australian investment firm, went from being a multibillion-dollar entity in 2008 to reaching insolvency in 2009. At that level of finances, train wrecks benefit someone. If this project is one of the three or four train wrecks, it’s hard to imagine how Imperial County will benefit.


Source:  Imperial Valley Press, www.ivpressonline.com 18 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky