[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Anger as wind turbine refusal is overturned  

Credit:  West Briton, www.thisiscornwall.co.uk 19 April 2012 ~~

Wind turbines are “one huge con”, says a parish council chairman infuriated after one was allowed on appeal on a farm at Longdowns.

Alan Bostock’s original application for a 56.5-metre-high turbine at Polkanuggo Farm attracted 58 letters of objection and a petition bearing more than 270 names.

Both Mabe and Stithians parish councils opposed it, citing its impact on neighbours, as did the Campaign to Protect Rural England.

Although planning officer Hollie Nicholls recommended approval, Cornwall Council’s planning committee refused it by ten votes to one.

However, Mr Bostock appealed and inspector Jill Kingaby concluded any harm was outweighed by its contribution towards reducing carbon emissions.

Peter Tisdale, chairman of Stithians Parish Council, said: “Wind turbines are one huge con which we all need to get a grip of before it’s too late.”

Ms Kingaby said the turbine would make “a small but important contribution” towards increasing energy from renewable sources and she did not believe the turbine’s appearance would be incongruous in the area because there were two already at Roskrow.

Three turbines were “not so numerous as to dominate the landscape”, she ruled.

Many residents had raised concerns about its proximity to their homes and flickering shadows from the blades, but Ms Kingaby said she believed any adverse effect would be slight and described the shadow flicker effect as rare.

“No specific distances are currently required in planning law,” she said in her finding.

“There would be an adverse effect on those within a short distance. However, the turbine would not be so intrusive that living conditions would become intolerable.”

Mr Tisdale said: “There is mounting evidence of the effects of low-frequency noise on health,” and he was also worried about noise monitoring once the turbine was installed and operational.

“Residents will have to complain when noise becomes a nuisance, and only then will they investigate complaints,” he said. “How well, and for how long, this monitoring will be carried out is a matter for speculation.”

Source:  West Briton, www.thisiscornwall.co.uk 19 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.