[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

State reps take stand on wind turbines 

Credit:  By Emily Clark, Wicked Local Plymouth, www.wickedlocal.com 18 April 2012 ~~

PLYMOUTH – Wind turbines are generating a hurricane of debate these days as more developers attempt to locate them in or near residential neighborhoods.

Senate President Therese Murray, D-Plymouth, and Rep. Vinny DeMacedo, R-Plymouth, have both taken positions against the siting of wind turbines in residential neighborhoods. Rep. Tom Calter, D-Kingston, says the the location of turbines should be up to the individual towns.

In a letter to Plymouth’s Zoning Board of Appeals, Murray speaks of her support of wind energy, but says residential neighborhoods are no place for turbines.

“It is my strong belief that industrial-size wind turbines do not belong in residential neighborhoods,” Murray writes. “Wind turbines have been a part of the renewable energy conversation in the commonwealth for some time now and I support wind energy….However, we must ensure that municipalities can move forward with turbine projects while preserving the health and well-being of residents. No one should be subject to unnecessary discomfort as a result of any turbine…”

DeMacedo said he, too, has been a supporter of wind energy for years but has been amazed by the push back from neighborhoods where turbines have been proposed.

“I support them, but when they are directly abutting a neighborhood, the neighbors that are affected should have some say as to whether they are installed or not,” deMacedo said.

Gov. Deval Patrick tried to pass a bill last year that would have loosened local control over wind turbines, and deMacedo said he was among many legislators who didn’t support it.

It’s one thing if abutters back a wind turbine project in their neighborhood, he added, particularly if they glean some benefit from the project. But forcing neighborhoods to simply accept turbines is another matter.

Calter said he strongly supports wind energy and lives in a neighborhood where turbines have been constructed. Kingston’s Town Meeting passed a wind energy bylaw that eliminated the need for special permits for wind turbine projects. But that was Kingston’s choice, Calter said, and it ought to be the same for other towns.

“I think residents have a right to their quiet enjoyment,” Calter said. “I think we have to be very wise with respect to our zoning bylaws and the public process. There are zoning laws in place that protect neighbors. I think the current zoning requirements need to be enforced.”

Residents need to make themselves heard through Town Meeting and their local legislators, Calter added. It should be up to the town whether wind turbines should be allowed in residential areas or not.

In Plymouth, wind turbine projects proposed off Hedges Pond Road and Head of the Bay Road have those neighborhoods up in arms. The Head of the Bay project was permitted, but is under appeal. The push back on a wind turbine project proposed at Plymouth North High School was so intense the plan was withdrawn, as was another plan to site a wind turbine in a junkyard on Columbus Road in North Plymouth. A wind turbine set to appear some time near the Colony Place Walmart hasn’t generated an appeal, but abutters aren’t happy about it.

The Zoning Board of Appeals is set to consider the Hedges Pond Road wind turbine project tonight (Wednesday). It remains to be seen whether the local legislators’ views on the subject will factor into the ZBA’s decision.

Source:  By Emily Clark, Wicked Local Plymouth, www.wickedlocal.com 18 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky