[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Shelburne residents debate wind power  

Credit:  By Tom Sturm, Valley Advocate, www.valleyadvocate.com 19 April 2012 ~~

An ongoing debate over wind power in the town of Shelburne has spawned public hearings and a petition calling for a ban on large-scale industrial wind power generation. Drafted in response to developer Don Field’s initial proposal to place eight 480-foot wind turbines on Mount Massaemat, the petition to ban commercial wind—and coal and nuclear—power development will be voted on by town residents May 1.

If the town decides to support the ban, any wind development in Shelburne will be limited to small, residential-scale projects.

At an April 10 meeting at the Buckland-Shelburne Elementary School, David Patrick, spokesman for the organizers of the petition drive, explained that that its primary goal was to protect the town from large commercial wind installations, an aim which seemed in conflict with a Planning Board vote to pursue a one-year moratorium on wind development that would include regulation of residential wind installations.

“We are not suggesting that residential uses of wind should not be regulated,” Patrick stated on behalf of petitioners. But, he added, “that can be done any time if the town’s boards or other petitioners wish to do so.”

The plan for a year-long moratorium was thrown into questionable legal territory when Field filed a revised application for his wind farm project before the Planning Board could pass the moratorium. The new application calls for only four 328-foot tall turbines on the mountain, in a move that downsizes Field’s commercial aspirations and would seem to be an attempt to give ground to opponents of his proposal. The Zoning Board, however, noted that Field’s first application was submitted without any supporting documents.

In contrast, Patrick’s group of petitioners claims to have spent more than a thousand hours researching the effects of industrial wind turbines, hearing expert opinions from health consultants, real estate professionals, wind and solar power representatives and acousticians, as well as from Massachusetts residents already living in proximity to active wind turbine projects. The group contends its studies have concluded that large-scale wind installations will produce a negative impact on health, wildlife, ecosystems and property values, and that “large wind turbines—whether 250 or 500 feet tall—do not belong anywhere near people or homes.” Patrick has stressed that the petitioners “strongly support responsible alternative energy sources,” but only if they are “appropriately sited.”

Though many residents of Shelburne and neighboring Buckland are in agreement with the petitioners, there are also those who support the proposed wind project, citing the ever-increasing cost of energy and the potential cost savings on electricity that might be reaped from such an installation. Wind is also a significantly cleaner energy source than nuclear or coal or other fossil fuels. Meetings, public hearings and votes on other proposed moratoria are also occurring within the next month in the surrounding towns of Buckland, Colrain and Heath.

Source:  By Tom Sturm, Valley Advocate, www.valleyadvocate.com 19 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.