[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Eminent domain trials canceled; MATL construction to resume 

Credit:  Written by KARL PUCKETT, www.greatfallstribune.com 14 April 2012 ~~

Construction has resumed on the northern portion of an embattled power transmission line, and the developer says it has reached easement agreements with landowners that are necessary to complete the southern portion of the project.

Two eminent domain trials associated with the Montana Alberta Tie Line between Great Falls and Lethbridge – scheduled to be heard earlier this week in Cascade and Teton counties – were canceled.

Harley Harris, senior legal counsel for MATL LLP, a subsidiary of Calgary-based developer Enbridge, said judges in both counties vacated the trials after agreements were reached between the company and landowners near Dutton, Power and Conrad.

The agreements resolve outstanding issues, including pole location and construction practices, with landowners agreeing to convey easements needed to complete the line, he said.

“The fact we can turn our attention to building a line, as opposed to litigating it, has to be seen by everybody as a positive development,” Harris said.

The line, billed as a $1 billion investment in renewable energy infrastructure, including spin-off wind farms, had been stalled as landowners and the former project owner, Tonbridge Power Inc., tangled over eminent domain and the location of the poles.

NaturEner USA of San Francisco, which will use the line, currently is gearing up to begin construction of a $430 million wind farm on the Kevin Rim in Glacier and Toole counties.

Harris said the goal of Enbridge is to complete the line by the end of the year.

The Teton County court has set aside one date, April 24, in the event MATL is not able to reach a final settlement agreement with all of the landowners, but Harris said he is confident the remaining details of the agreement will fall into place soon.

Hertha Lund , an attorney for the landowners, said the company is working hard to resolve past problems.

“We may be resolving our differences,” she said.

Lund represents about 40 clients. Some of the land involved in the dispute involves family members and is owned by more than one person.

The landowners have agreed to convey easements either to Enbridge or the Western Area Power Administration, Harris said.

WAPA, which issued a $161 million loan to construct the line, has an ownership interest in it.

Tonbridge, which launched the project, ran out of money and was criticized for its management by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Inspector General after it went $70 million over budget.

The line was sold in August to Enbridge, and construction resumed earlier this spring, said Tom Ring of the state Department of Environmental Quality.

The DEQ is now taking public comments on a proposed amendment by Enbridge for two minor adjustments in the line near Great Falls and Conrad,” he said. “It appears they are working things out, assuming they keep on the heading we’ve been told about.”

Construction is occurring south of the Marias River, with work proceeding south, Ring said.

He added that he has been impressed with the quality of work.

“They are not disturbing any more than they absolutely need to,” he said.

Res-America is the new contractor for the project, Harris said.

He added that the proposed changes in the line’s course are the result of negotiations with landowners. The company plans to apply for additional changes to accommodate landowners, he said.

The project was launched in response to demand from wind developers for additional transmission lines. It eventually sparked an argument over whether a power line to ship electricity out of state was a public use, and whether the line’s developer and operator had the right to use eminent domain to secure land to site poles for the line.

The state Supreme Court ruled that the use of eminent domain for the project was allowed, and the state Legislature passed a new law specifically saying merchant line developers had the right to eminent domain.

However, individual condemnation cases still remained unresolved in Cascade and Teton counties before District Judge Tom McKittrick of Cascade County and District Judge Nels Swandal of Teton County canceled the trials.

The judges previously ordered the sides to mediate. Former Montana Supreme Court Justice Jim Regnier was the mediator.

Source:  Written by KARL PUCKETT, www.greatfallstribune.com 14 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky