[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine would hurt Cumbrian village – council  

Credit:  By Julian Whittle, News & Star, www.newsandstar.co.uk 14 April 2012 ~~

A 328ft wind turbine near Cumwhinton would have “significant adverse visual effects”, Carlisle City Council will argue at a public inquiry.

Bolsterstone Innovative Energy has appealed against the council’s decision to refuse planning permission for a turbine at Newlands Farm near junction 42 of the M6. The firm originally wanted to put three turbines there.

That scheme was thrown out in 2010 after an inquiry, prompting Bolsterstone to table two more planning applications – one for a single turbine, the other for two. Both brought more than 1,100 objections.

They were rejected by councillors in November on the grounds that the turbines would be too close to Cringles Farm and Beech Cottage, and to 14 new homes due to be built next to Beech Cottage.

The council is now shifting its position ahead of the appeal, which will be heard by a planning inspector at Carlisle Civic Centre from May 29 to 31.

Its adviser, Mark Steele Consultants, believes other nearby homes will be hit too. These include properties along the B6263 in Cumwhinton and in Cumwhinton Road and Garlands Road.

The council is also investigating the potential impact on homes in Holme Meadow and Broomfallen Road. An outline of its case says: “There are other properties in the vicinity upon which the turbine will have significant adverse visual effects/harm to amenity, which further justify refusal.

“The council will argue that the harm is not outweighed by the benefits of the proposal and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed.”

Villagers will also be represented at the appeal. They raised more than £23,000 to fight the first public inquiry in 2009.

They say they need another £13,500 to pay for a legal team and expert witnesses to put their case this time.

Meanwhile, 58 people have objected to a planning application from EDF Energy Renewables to renew consent for a temporary wind-monitoring mast at Solway Moss near Longtown.

The mast collects data to assess the site’s suitability for a windfarm. A proposal for nine turbines up to 413ft high was refused in December. Objectors say there is no longer a need for a monitoring mast, given the windfarm has been turned down.

The application for the mast goes before councillors on Friday. Planning officers are recommending it is approved.

Source:  By Julian Whittle, News & Star, www.newsandstar.co.uk 14 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.