LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Inquiry into Purbeck turbines 

Credit:  Dorset Echo, www.dorsetecho.co.uk 12 April 2012 ~~

More than 50 members of the public crowded into a village hall to hear arguments for and against the building of four giant wind turbines in Purbeck.

A public inquiry into the project opened at Furzebrook near Wareham into plans for the Alaska Wind Farm. It is due to last 12 days, Purbeck District Council’s planning board decided it was ‘minded to approve’ the Purbeck Windfarm LLP application in November last year subject to conditions.

But just four months later, they rejected the scheme for Masters Quarry in Puddletown Road, East Stoke, amid concerns over noise and the effect on local people.

Peter Wadsley, counsel for Purbeck District Council, told the inquiry the turbines would be large, in an elevated position, and would have an adverse effect on residents and people at Buddens Farm Scout and Activity Centre.

David Cocks QC, representing the Dorset Against Rural Turbines group, said the site would be visible from as far away as Poole. The turbines, at up to 125 metres, would be nearly as tall as the highest hills in Purbeck.

He said there were 114 properties within a 2.5-kilometre radius, and in 57 of those, people were likely to suffer sleep disturbance.

Patrick Robinson, lawyer for the appellant, said there was a high level of support for the scheme, which would help the UK achieve its targets of increasing renewable energy and reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

Source:  Dorset Echo, www.dorsetecho.co.uk 12 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky