| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Stategy could still result in wind farms
Credit: www.viewfrompublishing.co.uk 11 April 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Countryside campaigners have criticised the latest draft renewable energy strategy for Dorset.
CPRE Dorset say the policy could still pave the way for hundreds of wind turbines in the county and takes little account of Dorset’s beautiful landscape.
The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) group in the county is now calling on local people to read and comment on the policy before the end of June deadline.
CPRE Dorset chairman Richard Nicholls said: “County councillors seem to be labouring under the impression that the majority of people in Dorset welcome wind turbines but this is not our experience and we are appealing for people to make their voices heard.
“If those who oppose wind turbines in our spectacular and much-loved landscape do not speak up we could end up with hundreds of industrial-scale wind farms.”
He is also critical that the document has been sent to only a limited number of organisations with an invitation to endorse the draft strategy.
Mr Nicholls says CPRE also questions the timing of the county council cabinet’s approval of the strategy, just days before the start of the appeal over four wind turbines at Alaska Farm, East Stoke near Wareham.
At the cabinet meeting only one councillor, Andrew Cattway, voted against the draft renewable energy strategy. He questioned the criteria which had been used by consultants to draw up the possible number of wind turbines which might be needed, based on 2007 figures.
“We could see a large number of industrial-scale wind turbines as a result of this strategy paper.
“CPRE quote 360 and, if I recall, the previous draft paper gave a figure of 180.”
Cabinet environment spokesman Councillor Robert Gould said the paper was a non-statutory document which had been changed from the original as a result of 186 responses from organisations and individuals.
“The impact of wind farms have been considered and it needs to be remembered any applications will be tested by the planning process and through local plans which we hope local people will engage with.”
Councillor John Wilson, the cabinet’s sustainability champion, described onshore wind farms as “the least desirable option we have to face” and said he hoped that other technologies, such as biomass would limit the need for turbines in Dorset.
Planning officer Antony Littlechild said the figures in the strategy were not hard and fast.
His colleague Peter West told the cabinet, when talking about wind turbines: “Personally I don’t think there will be more than 30 in Dorset by 2020.”
But he did admit that much of the target was made up by including the Navitus Bay windfarm being proposed off the Dorset coast.
Ending the debate council leader Angus Campbell said : “We have expressed our concern that wind turbines are not appropriate for most of Dorset, if at all. We need to look at other ways of creating energy which is not detrimental to Dorset.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=21767 ]
