[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Explaining their support of a commercial wind farm ban  

Credit:  By DIANE BRONCACCIO, Recorder staff, The Recorder, www.recorder.com 10 April 2012 ~~

SHELBURNE FALLS – A day before a public hearing on a bylaw proposal that would ban commercial wind farms in Shelburne, a dozen supporters of that proposal gathered on the Buckland side of the Bridge of Flowers to explain why they hope Shelburne voters will support the ban.

“We think this petition is pretty straight forward,” said David Patrick of Shelburne Center, one of the organizers of a petition signed by 46 Shelburne residents to ban wind farms, coal-burning plants and nuclear power plants from town.

“I think it’s important; this is an issue that concerns the whole town (Shelburne) and both sides of the river,” he said, referring to Buckland residents who live in Shelburne Falls. “Those of us who have taken the time to do the research on it have become convinced that large industrial wind turbines are a bad idea. It seems to be that, once the towers get somewhere above 125 feet high, the whole dynamic of operation changes.” Patrick cited the health complaints reported in Falmouth that appeared to have been a result of a large turbine located close to homes there.

“All that stuff explodes exponentially, when the towers get larger. That’s why we were careful to distinguish between the large commercial towers and smaller ones (for private use): What we wanted to do was to send a clear signal that we are not opposed to wind turbines, but we are opposed to industrial wind turbines.”

The news conference was organized by Lamia Holland and Janet Sinclair of Buckland. When asked why, as Buckland residents, they were getting involved in a Shelburne planning issue, Holland said she and other Buckland residents within the village of Shelburne Falls have as much at stake as the Shelburne residents, although they don’t vote in Shelburne and weren’t able to sign the petition for a ban in Shelburne.

“There’s not a town named ‘Shelburne Falls,’ but there’s so much that the village does that includes both towns (Buckland and Shelburne),” said Holland. “But when it comes to something like this – we have a direct view of that mountain,” she said, pointing to Mount Massaemet, where a wind farm is proposed to be built, about 1½ miles from her home.

“I’m really sick of talking about wind turbines,” she added. “I really want a bylaw that fully bans industrial turbines. I don’t want to wait another year to see what’s going to happen.”

The public hearing on the commercial wind turbine ban in Shelburne takes place today at 7 p.m. in Buckland-Shelburne Elementary School.

Holland’s remark about “waiting another year” referred to the Shelburne Planning Board’s proposal for a yearlong moratorium on wind turbines, to give the board time to develop a wind turbine siting bylaw for Shelburne, for both residential and commercialscale turbines.

However, before they voted in favor of a moratorium, a new proposal was submitted by Frederick “Don” Field of Mount Massaemet Windfarm Inc. for a 6-megawatt, four-turbine wind facility on the mountain, east of the Shelburne State Forest.

Patrick has said the group has spent at least 1,000 hours researching wind turbines and has invited several experts on wind and solar power – as well as people living near such facilities – to speak in Memorial Hall.

Source:  By DIANE BRONCACCIO, Recorder staff, The Recorder, www.recorder.com 10 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.