[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ex-planner objects to approval for Cork harbour wind turbines  

Credit:  FRANK McDONALD, Environment Editor, The Irish Times, www.irishtimes.com 9 April 2012 ~~

A former senior planner with Cork County Council is among those appealing the council’s decision to approve plans by four pharmachem companies for six very large wind turbines in the Ringaskiddy area of Cork harbour.

Separate applications by De Puy, GSK, Janssen and Novartis for turbines with a tip height of 150 metres were approved by assistant county manager Declan Daly against the advice of senior planner Paul Murphy, who recommended that permission be refused.

Mr Murphy noted that Cork harbour had been designated “one of the finest natural harbours in the world” and said the proposed turbines would be “excessively visually obtrusive” and “impact adversely” on the homes of 1,200 people living in the vicinity.

However, Mr Daly took the view that it was important to support the multinational companies based in Ringaskiddy, where 7,800 people are employed, and their drive to reduce both operating costs and carbon footprints by installing renewable energy capacity.

“Particular reference is made to Cobh cathedral and how it is observed from the mouth of the harbour,” he said in an explanatory note on his decision. “The photomontages do not suggest to me any sense of competition between the turbines and the cathedral.”

However, Tricia Treacy, who retired from the council in 2010, said in her appeal to An Bord Pleanála that the visual character of the harbour would be “badly scarred by these huge structures, which would be so out of scale with the existing buildings, landscape and topography”.

Her submission noted that the spire of Cobh cathedral “is a little under 92 metres high”, but the proposed turbines at Ringaskiddy would be “on very much higher ground and they would have moving blades, so their visual impact would be much stronger”.

If they were to be permitted, a “very strong precedent would be set”, she warned. Not only would they cause “shocking damage to the visual amenities and character of the harbour, but the ‘free-for-all’ that would surely follow would be utterly disastrous visually”.

There were also public safety issues, as the turbines were to be built on industrial sites operating on a 24-hour basis, with one located 750m from Shanbally National School. “The consequences of an accident such as a rotor blade falling off would be catastrophic.”

Ms Treacy noted that the reports of Cork County Council’s senior planner, Mr Murphy, and environmental officer Dr Mary Stack, suggested that some of the turbines “will have detrimental shadow flicker, if not noise impacts, on nearby dwellings and other occupied buildings”.

Although the ostensible purpose of the project was to reduce energy costs and cut the carbon footprint of each of the four companies, she said “no attempt has been made to explain how and why on-site wind turbines would be the most effective means of achieving this”.

She noted that the four applications “are effectively for one wind farm project run by a single project team” – the Cork Lower Harbour Energy Group – but the fact that they were lodged separately “made it much more difficult for third parties to see the wood for the trees”.

While a considerable number of objections had been made, mainly by local residents, Ms Treacy said many were deterred by the cost, as it was very expensive for an individual to object and to appeal against all four decisions – €80 for the objections and €880 for the appeals.

Source:  FRANK McDONALD, Environment Editor, The Irish Times, www.irishtimes.com 9 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.