[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Maryland House approves bill to subsidize offshore wind development  

Credit:  By Greg Masters, The Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com ~~

A bill to subsidize development of what could be the nation’s first Atlantic offshore wind farm – one of Gov. Martin O’Malley’s signature initiatives – won approval Friday in the Maryland House of Delegates.

The bill, which passed overwhelmingly after an hour-long debate, now heads to the Senate.

The plan would add a fee to every Marylander’s monthly electric bill for 20 years and thousands of dollars to the bills of the state’s largest businesses to construct a multibillion-dollar offshore wind farm off the coast of Ocean City.

O’Malley (D) has argued the plan would create about 2,000 jobs and give Maryland a leg up on neighboring states in a new green-energy market.

A similar bill failed to gain momentum last year, when lawmakers raised questions about how much of the cost and risk ratepayers would be asked to shoulder.

O’Malley returned this year with a bill that would cap the average monthly cost to residents at $2. But in negotiations with lawmakers, the administration agreed to lower the monthly subsidy charged to residential customers to $1.50. The fee on large commercial and industrial users was lowered by 40 percent, to 1.5 percent of their electrical bill.

The fee would not be added to residents’ bills until at least 2017, the earliest date the administration expects an offshore wind farm would be in operation.

But Republicans, who blasted the bill as politically motivated, said it would still place too much of a burden on ratepayers and add to an array of tax and fee hikes O’Malley has proposed this session.

“As we’re getting ready to raise income taxes and raise flush fees and raise everything else, we’re going to kick them again with a little surcharge so that we can deliver a wind bill and a photo-op under great political pressure,” said House Minority Leader Anthony J. O’Donnell (R-Calvert).

Del. Dereck E. Davis (D-Prince George’s), chairman of the committee that backed O’Malley’s plan, disputed suggestions that he had been pressured.

“You guys know me. Nobody can pressure me into a darn thing. I’m a grown man,” Davis said.

Del. Brian K. McHale (D-Baltimore), a committee member, also denied O’Malley had pressured the panel to advance the legislation. “There was pressure on this bill, and the pressure came from the committee to the administration to make sure that this bill is so much different from last year’s bill,” he said.

Del. Benjamin F. Kramer (D-Montgomery), who was unconvinced last year but threw his support behind this year’s bill, said ratepayers would not see any fee increase “until the offshore wind facility is built, operating and producing electricity.”

“If those turbines collapse into the sea, it will not cost the ratepayers a nickel,” he said.

Administration officials said they believed the smaller subsidy could support a wind farm of about 40 turbines that would produce 200 megawatts annually. That would be less than half of what O’Malley sought when he first introduced the idea before the 2011 legislative session.

Source:  By Greg Masters, The Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.