[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

State to fall short of wind power goal, studies say 

Credit:  By NAOMI SCHALIT and JOHN CHRISTIE, Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, www.pressherald.com 30 March 2012 ~~

Maine will not be able to accomplish the state-mandated goal of building 2000 megawatts of wind power on land by 2015.

That’s one conclusion of two studies issued this week by the governor’s energy office and an independent group of researchers.

The studies also urged reconsideration of the landmark 2008 law that allowed wind turbines to be built in ecologically and scenically important areas of the state.

“No one imagines that we’ll be meeting the goal at 2015,” said Stephen Ward, co-author of “Maine Wind Assessment 2012.” “In order to meet the 2015 goal, at least 552 new turbines will have to be permitted and become operational by 2012, and – depending on the size of the turbines – potentially as many as 1,103 turbines will be needed.”

The state is “making progress, though, in meeting the off-shore wind goals for 2020 and 2030,” says Ward’s report, produced by Coastal Enterprises, Inc. for the Office of Energy Independence and Security. No off-shore wind farms have been built.

Maine has eight large-scale, land-based wind projects producing a total of 345.5 megawatts and five more projects in the pipeline that will generate 300.8 additional megawatts.

Ward’s report, in turn, formed the basis of a report given Wednesday to a legislative committee by Ken Fletcher, head of the governor’s energy office.

That report, “Maine Wind Energy Development Assessment,” also predicts the state’s land-based wind-power goals will not be met.

“We’re not saying anybody has failed,” Fletcher said. “It’s just that the economic realities of the economy and the cost structure of wind seems to make it more of a challenge to get to the installed capacity.”

Both reports recommend changing state law to reflect more modest goals for 2015.

That worried Jeremy Payne, head of the Maine Renewable Energy Association, which represents the state’s wind developers.

“I don’t understand the purpose of stepping back from the goal,” Payne said. “Why would we want to do that and send a bad signal to the investors – it’s a confusing signal to send to them at the wrong time.”

Payne said opponents of wind projects who mount legal appeals were to blame for slow progress toward Maine’s wind development goals. “You’re talking years upon years to get a decision,” he said.

The reports were done at the behest of legislators on the Utilities and Energy Committee who wanted a review of the Wind Energy Act.

The act was the product of a task force of wind energy supporters empaneled by then-Gov. John Baldacci, a strong booster of wind power. It gave developers a fast track to putting up wind turbines in some of the state’s treasured landscapes, including sensitive ecological areas above 2,700 feet, and established aggressive goals that would have placed up to 2000 turbines on Maine’s landscape by 2030.

The map of that “Expedited Wind Zone” was put together by the task force in closed-door meetings for which no written records were kept. The Coastal report said that redoing the map with a more diverse group would be a good idea.

“The Governor, the Legislature or DEP could convene a panel of disinterested parties to identify where in Maine expedited permitting could go forward in a way that causes no harm to local residents or environments,” the authors wrote.

The report also says the conflict that’s arisen in recent years over siting of wind tower projects might be addressed by a different – more public – process.

“It may also be desirable to convene a group that is not composed entirely of interested stakeholders as also was the case in 2007,” the report says.

Fletcher’s report recommended lawmakers find better ways to evaluate the visual impacts of wind towers … and adopt policies requiring consideration of the cumulative impacts of multiple wind developments.

And the Coastal report notes that while two state agencies – the Land Use Regulation Commission and the Maine Historic Preservation Commission – recognize sporting camps as “an iconic and historic cultural resource” worthy of protection from development, the state’s wind power laws do not, and perhaps should.

“We need to find an appropriate balance and process, not that we don’t want to do projects,” Fletcher said.

Source:  By NAOMI SCHALIT and JOHN CHRISTIE, Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, www.pressherald.com 30 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky