LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Claim and counter-claim over Redcar offshore windfarm 

Credit:  by Dave Robson, Evening Gazette, www.gazettelive.co.uk 29 March 2012 ~~

Claims that the firm developing Redcar’s offshore windfarm released a lot of hot air about its energy-saving credentials have been denied.

Before EDF Energy Renewables began offshore construction work in February, it distributed leaflets stating the windfarm would save 200,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions a year.

But Malcolm Covell, of New Marske, a keen follower of the national debate about windfarms, was sceptical and carried out his own calculations using standards approved by Renewables UK, the body representing the wind industry.

He said that by using “old, discredited figures” calculated in 2001, EDF came up with a 250% exaggeration of the true figure of only 80,000 tonnes.

But the company denies deliberately misleading anyone, saying “the most recent form of calculation was not available when the Teesside project was first conceived”.

Mr Covell said: “They made a very basic mistake in not using figures agreed by the wind industry back in 2008.

“The question, is why didn’t EDF update their figures to meet the 2008 agreed industry standards?”

But an EDF spokesman said the firm “totally refutes” any suggestions the CO2 reduction figures used are incorrect or have been exaggerated.

“When the power output of the Teesside windfarm is compared to the same amount of electricity provided by a coal-fired power station, the saving would be about 200,000 tonnes.

“When compared with a mix of power generation sources, including gas for example, it would be between 80,000-90,000 tonnes.

The spokesman said: “Both figures are correct.

“Whichever way it is measured, the Teesside Offshore Windfarm will be making a significant contribution to helping to meet future Government targets for reduced CO2 emissions.”

Source:  by Dave Robson, Evening Gazette, www.gazettelive.co.uk 29 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky