[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

What’s really killing those big birds  

Credit:  www.bakersfield.com 27 March 2012 ~~

The March 16 article “Environmental groups petition EPA to ban lead in ammunition” addressed the concern that certain environmental groups have about lead bullets on their potential, unproven effects on California condors, eagles and other scavengers.

I contend, based on the newspaper’s reporting, that the wind farms located in the Tehachapi Mountains kill more raptor birds than all the lead bullets in California. Last I read, the tally was more than 60 supposedly federally protected golden eagles and an uncountable number of hawks and falcons have died due to the rotating blades. Why is it the environmental groups and U.S. Fish and Game are ignoring these losses and not shutting down the wind farms until they come up with a fix to stop the slaughter?

We moved to Tehachapi six years ago. At that time, we had golden eagles land and nest in pine trees behind our house in Stallion Springs. They began disappearing when the wind farms started expanding. Now there are no more golden eagles here. Hopefully, a few California condors will be killed by the blades, if they haven’t already. Maybe then the environmentalists will come out of their cocoons and gripe about that instead of complaining about a “possible” lead hazard without solid scientific proof.

When will The Californian take the lead to stop the killing of these birds? The Californian needs to press the federal and state EPA as well as U.S. and California Fish and Game to shut down the windmills and force their owners to come up with solutions to stop the deaths of so many birds.

Charles Walters


Source:  www.bakersfield.com 27 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.