[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind developers ‘at fault over anti-wind backlash’  

Credit:  Catherine Early, Windpower Monthly, 27 March 2012, 3:42pm www.windpowermonthly.com ~~

UK: Wind developers in England are fighting a legacy of “resentment and hostility” caused by their own past behaviour when going through the permitting process, according to one of the UK’s foremost environmentalists.

The comments were from Jonathon Porritt who was formerly chair of government advisory body the Sustainable Development Commission, director of Friends of the Earth and co-chair of the Green Party.

Speaking at Scottish Renewables’ conference in Edinburgh, Porritt said that some large “brutish” developers had ridden roughshod over communities in England in the past and although there were signs of a change in behaviour, it was “too bloody late”.

Previous dismissal of communities’ concerns had left a legacy that the right-wing, anti-wind press can feed off, he said.

Porritt acknowledged that the anti-wind lobby was the main cause of low rates of permitting approval. However, he said that wind projects in Scotland did not face such hostile opposition due to the encouragement of community ownership. This has led to a more mature debate about wind, he said.

Just 41% of wind projects received a permit in England in 2010-11, compared to 62% in Scotland, according to RenewableUK.

Porritt’s comments came as the UK government published new guidance for the permitting system. The guidance, which reduced over 1,000 pages to a mere 50, is an attempt by the government to simplify the planning system to boost economic growth. However, both the wind industry and landscape campaigners have argued that it is too vague and will result in more projects going through the appeal system, increasing costs and delays.

Source:  Catherine Early, Windpower Monthly, 27 March 2012, 3:42pm www.windpowermonthly.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.