News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

House panel approves offshore wind farm bill  

Credit:  By Michael Dresser, The Baltimore Sun, www.baltimoresun.com 26 March 2012 ~~

A key part of Gov. Martin O’Malley’s environmental agenda cleared an important hurdle Monday as his bill seeking to foster development of an offshore wind farm near Ocean City won approval from a House committee.

The Economic Matters Committee voted 13-9 to send a scaled-back version of the legislation to the House floor, where it is likely to receive a vote by the end of the week.

The House committee’s action pleased environmental activists, who were dismayed last year when an earlier version of O’Malley’s bill never emerged from committee in either the House or the Senate.

“This could be a stepping-stone to having Maryland be at least one of the centers of this new industry,” said Tommy Landers, policy advocate for Environment Maryland.

The initiative still faces an uphill climb to win passage this year. A companion measure has been stuck in the Senate Finance Committee. But Sen. Thomas M. “Mac” Middleton, its chairman, said Monday he believes the House action improves the chances the bill will win a majority on his panel.

Middleton, a Charles County Democrat, said he expects his committee to make similar changes. If the bill clears his committee, Middleton said, he believes it will pass the full Senate.

The legislation seeks to create conditions that would encourage a developer to build a wind farm off the coast of Ocean City to provide a clean form of alternative energy for the Maryland market. It would do so by guaranteeing the developer a customer base once the wind farm was up and running.

Under the original legislation, Maryland ratepayers would have had to pay up to $2 a month extra on their bills once the wind farm was built to help cover the extra generation costs. Under amendments adopted by the committee Monday, the possible fee was reduced to $1.50.

For industrial and commercial users, the 2.5 percent increase allowed under the original bill was lowered to 1.5 percent.

O’Malley’s press secretary, Raquel Guillory, said the administration considers the committee action good news. “We consider this a significant step forward to a more sustainable future,” she said. Guillory said the governor hopes the Senate panel will follow suit.

Mike Tidwell, executive director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, said the practical effect of the changes would be to decrease the size of the possible wind farm from one with about 60 turbines to one with about 40 – a number he nevertheless called “an important start.”

“It signals that Maryland is ready to make offshore wind power a public policy,” he said.

Del. Dereck E. Davis, chairman of the Economic Matters Committee, said the reduction in the potential cost to electricity customers is the most important change made to the bill. “We want to limit the exposure to our ratepayers,” he said.

O’Malley has contended that the costs of offshore wind development would be outweighed by the benefits of broadening the diversity of the state’s energy sources and developing a new industry that could yield thousands of jobs.

A significant minority of the committee, including all of its Republicans, was not persuaded. Dorchester County Del. Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio, the House minority whip, said she saw few benefits in the project for the Eastern Shore.

“My constituents are the ones who are going to live with this project,” she said, adding that they have the “most at stake and the least to gain.”

Source:  By Michael Dresser, The Baltimore Sun, www.baltimoresun.com 26 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.