[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Federal regulators deny move against Wyoming wind farm 

Credit:  By JEREMY FUGLEBERG Star-Tribune energy reporter, trib.com 20 March 2012 ~~

Federal energy regulators on Friday tamped down another barrier raised by a group opposed to the development of a wind energy project proposed for south of Glenrock.

The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Thursday denied a petition by the Northern Laramie Range Alliance that would have effectively killed a pair of adjacent wind farms on ridges in the Mormon Canyon area, proposed by Wasatch Wind of Park City, Utah.

The alliance is a group of area residents against what they call “industrialization” in the northern arc of the Laramie Range. They have fought the Wasatch Wind project

before county commissioners, a state industrial permit board and a state district judge, but so far have failed to stop the project.

In its petition to the regulatory commission, the alliance claimed Wasatch had improperly split its proposal into two smaller projects to take advantage of a federal law requiring that utilities must give priority to small energy projects when signing agreements to purchase power from producers, such as Wasatch Wind.

The company had talked up its proposal as a single project, with plans to connect to transmission lines at a single point, and got a single-project permit from both county and state officials, the alliance said.

The alliance claimed Wasatch gamed the system by dividing the project into two parts to push it to the head of the line of power sellers to Rocky Mountain Power, the utility in the area.

While the 100-megawatt, 62-turbine Wasatch Pioneer Park wind project wouldn’t qualify if considered a single project, the project consists of two different turbine clusters spaced at least a mile away – the distance required by the commission.

By forcing the utility to buy power produced from the wind energy project, Wasatch would zap Rocky Mountain Power customers with higher electricity rates, the alliance said.

Power utility Xcel Energy filed an opinion in the case, saying it didn’t have any interest in the matter. But the utility wanted the commission to be aware Xcel had seen similar, “not isolated” examples of a large project split into smaller parts to take advantage of federal rules.

On Thursday, the commission disagreed with the alliance’s claims, saying its one-mile rule applied in this situation. The commission said it wouldn’t examine whether Wasatch was indeed gaming the system.

“As with the positive decisions we’ve received for other NLRA challenges, we’re pleased but not surprised,” Wasatch Wind spokeswoman Michelle Stevens said. “The law governing our status with FERC is clear and we’ve followed the law. The claims by the NLRA that we are somehow gaming the system are false and now this is proven.”

On Monday, the group’s steering committee said it was disappointed by the commision’s decision.

“The alliance is considering the options open to it to appeal this decision on behalf of its members and other Rocky Mountain Power customers,” the Northern Laramie Range Alliance said in a media release.

On Friday, the alliance appealed lawsuits against county and state permits for the project to the Wyoming Supreme Court. A state district court judge in January affirmed both the state and county permits for the Wasatch project, which the company says it will begin construction on this spring.

The alliance also has appealed to a state court a Wyoming Public Service Commission decision that gave Wasatch more time – beyond the end of 2011 – to start delivering power from its project.

Source:  By JEREMY FUGLEBERG Star-Tribune energy reporter, trib.com 20 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon