[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

New Mexico set to overturn carbon cap 

Credit:  By Christa Marshall • E&E • Posted: Monday, March 19, 2012 via: governorswindenergycoalition.org ~~

New Mexico is expected to repeal a rule today that would have established a carbon cap in the state.

The move culminates a multiyear fight between supporters who said the cap would have made the state a leader on climate change and opponents who said it would limit economic growth. The state cap would have taken effect in 2013 and required 3 percent annual cuts in carbon dioxide emissions below 2010 levels.

“They’ve already made up their mind,” said Bruce Frederick, a staff attorney at the New Mexico Environmental Law Center, about the state environmental improvement board, which is scheduled to take a vote on the issue today.

He said his group – which supports the cap – plans to appeal the decision to the appellate court and New Mexico Supreme Court.

He said the outcome was certain after Gov. Susana Martinez (R), who assumed office in January 2011, appointed the current board. The rule set to be repealed today was passed in 2010 by a different set of regulators appointed by former Gov. Bill Richardson (D), who supported emission limits.

“This will not come up again” under the current governor, Frederick said.

Martinez has slammed climate limits as “cap and tax” programs and moved last year to block the carbon rule’s publication in the state register before being blocked by the state Supreme Court.

Opponents of the cap, including PNM Resources and the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association, have long said that the proposal would increase costs for energy customers.

“No proven commercial available control technologies exist for reducing greenhouse gas emissions at existing generation facilities, and even if such technologies did exist, it would be impossible to permit and construct such devices on existing resources between now and 2013,” opponents wrote last year in official documents with the board.

Green groups have said the cap would have cost utilities less than 1 percent of their annual revenues while boosting clean-energy companies.

Today’s vote follows on the heels of a decision by the board in February to repeal separate cap-and-trade rules that would have allowed the state to participate in a regional carbon trading program with California and Canadian provinces known as the Western Climate Initiative.

Source:  By Christa Marshall • E&E • Posted: Monday, March 19, 2012 via: governorswindenergycoalition.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon