[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Facts blow wind power off course  

Credit:  Scotland on Sunday, www.scotsman.com 18 March 2012 ~~

In response to Professor Anthony Trewavas (Debate, 11 March) may I point out that power provision in Scotland is not a devolved option so the Scottish Government can control it only in a negative way through planning permission which, as he indicates, it does with gusto.

There are a number of things which Holyrood either does not realise or, more likely, chooses to misrepresent for purely political purposes. First is the oft-stated claim of 100 per cent renewable energy by 2020. This actually refers solely to electrical energy which happens to be only 18 per cent of Scotland’s power usage.

Secondly, wind turbines have a life of only 25 years so soon we will be faced with starting a multi-billion pound waste disposal and renewal programme which no-one seems to have addressed.

Thirdly, we do not actually produce energy. What we do is energy conversion, which is not a 100 per cent process. The much-vaunted pumped hydro is not a means of producing energy but, being a three-stage process (source to electrical energy to pumped storage to output electrical energy), a means of rapidly consuming it and is useful only as a means of energy management.

If we could get a reliable 30 per cent of wind turbines working simultaneously (the usual most optimistic claim) then, at 70 per cent conversion for each of the remaining two stages on an on/off 50 per cent cycle we would require 3,000 land turbines to produce 1 GW of “direct” consumer-usable electrical energy and 1 GW of pumped storage energy. However, the uncertainty of wind power means that back-up equivalent to the required 3 GW would still be needed. A 2 GW nuclear system coupled with pumped hydro would produce the same result for at least 50 years without this back-up, at a fraction of the cost and with a fraction of the required expensive and unsightly distribution network.

Scotland’s total electrical requirements would be almost entirely satisfied by only three such systems together with existing “conventional” hydro installations. A bit of marine power on top would do the rest. Who needs wind, which was more or less abandoned in the 19th century, as a reliable energy source? Does Mr Salmond, with his usual bravado, really want Scotland to “lead the world” in this direction?

Dr A McCormick, Dumfries

Source:  Scotland on Sunday, www.scotsman.com 18 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.