[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm kicked out as ‘a blot on the landscape’ 

Credit:  Andrews Dickens, www.cambridge-news.co.uk 14 March 2012 ~~

Campaigners are celebrating after an appeal to build four 125-metre wind turbines near Kimbolton was thrown out.

Government planning inspector Paul Jackson announced that an appeal by developer Broadview Energy to build Bicton Wind Farm had been dismissed following a lengthy public inquiry.

It was decided the scheme would spoil the area’s “sensitive character”.

Huntingdonshire District Council rejected the proposal last year because it contravened planning policies and damaged the cultural heritage of the area within 2km of the scheme, on the former Kimbolton Airfield.

Broadview Energy launched an appeal, leading to an inquiry at the council’s headquarters during different periods from last August until January.

In dismissing the appeal, the inspector said: “The sensitive character of this valley landscape would be seriously adversely affected, the enjoyment of the attractive valley landscape impaired and the settings of important heritage assets significantly harmed.”

Martin Patterson, chairman of Stop Bicton Wind Farm and founding chairman Richard Murphy said in a statement: “We are both delighted by this result.

“It has vindicated the district council’s own planning guidance that developers should ‘avoid locating turbines within the more intimate landscape of the valleys and along valley crests where they will be out of scale with the landscape and settlements such as Kimbolton’ and has found, as we have always maintained, that the harm of this development would outweigh any benefits.”

Broadview’s project manager, Tom Cosgrove, said: “We are obviously disappointed with the decision and we continue to believe the site to be a good location for a wind farm of this size.

“We have invested a lot of time in preparing this application and engaging with the local community, and we believed we had found the correct balance between maximising the energy generation of the proposal and minimising impacts on the local environment. We are currently digesting the inspector’s report and considering our next steps.”

The developers now have six weeks to decide whether or not to challenge the result.

However, they can only do this on a point of law through a judicial review in the High Court.

Source:  Andrews Dickens, www.cambridge-news.co.uk 14 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon