| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Stabenow’s green-energy tax break plan falls short
Credit: By Josiah Ryan and Ben Geman, thehill.com 13 March 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The Senate on Tuesday rejected plans to extend a host of lapsed or soon-to-expire tax breaks for renewable fuels and power sources.
Lawmakers voted 49-49 for Sen. Debbie Stabenow’s (D-Mich.) amendment to transportation legislation, but 60 votes were needed for approval.
The vote signals political hurdles facing advocates of green-energy tax breaks, notably the production tax credit for wind power projects that’s expiring at year’s end, an incentive that’s crucial to financing new development.
The number of new wind projects brought online has dropped sharply when the credit has been allowed to lapse in the past.
Stabenow’s plan would have also extended various incentives for energy efficient homes and appliances, plug-in vehicles, production of certain biofuels and a program that provides grants in lieu of tax credits for renewable power, among others.
But while the Senate didn’t extend the green-energy tax breaks, lawmakers also rejected Sen. Jim DeMint’s (R-S.C.) amendment to kill a range of energy-related tax incentives.
His plan, defeated 26-72, would have repealed a suite of tax credits for green-electricity projects, plug-in cars and renewable transport fuels, as well as some for oil-and-gas companies, while applying the savings to a commensurate cut in the corporate tax rate.
DeMint argued for the amendment along ideological lines on Tuesday, saying that Congress ought not to be choosing winners and losers within the energy industry.
“If we let the market work we are going to have wind and have solar anyway … this is no way to try to run a free market economy, to try to run it from this room,” he said.
—This story was updated at 3:30 p.m. to reflect the defeat of the DeMint amendment.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=20525 ]
