News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Sen. Schultz sides with Democrats against new wind farm rules bill  

Credit:  CLAY BARBOUR | Wisconsin State Journal, host.madison.com 7 March 2012 ~~

For the second time this week, Sen. Dale Schultz on Wednesday stood in the way of his party on a piece of environmental legislation.

An attempt to kill existing windmill siting rules – more than a year in the making – was beaten back with the help of the Richland Center Republican, who earlier in the week sided with Democrats to defeat a controversial mining bill.

The measure, authored by Sen. Frank Lasee, R-De Pere, would have repealed a set of rules currently stuck in the state Public Service Commission, where officials have worked unsuccessfully to reach a compromise between wind industry supporters and their critics.

Those rules were suspended by the Republican-led state budget committee just before going into effect last March. They will again go into effect as written March 15, the last day of the current legislative session, unless lawmakers repeal or change them.

The location of windmills has been a controversial issue in the state. Critics of the industry contend the energy generators hurt property values and can lead to health problems.

Officials wanted a new set of uniform statewide rules that would give the wind industry some consistency across Wisconsin, rather than a patchwork of rules that changed with every municipality.

The rules in the PSC require wind turbines have a setback from the nearest property line of 1.1 times the height of the turbine, or roughly 450 feet for an average windmill. The rules also require turbines be at least 1,250 feet away from the nearest residence.

Lasee, a longtime critic of the statewide rules, said that distance is not far enough from people’s homes. “We should get past this ‘green energy no matter the cost’ thinking,” he said.

He said “Democrats and Schultz” killed his bill. On Wednesday, Schultz said he was sympathetic to Lasee’s concerns but had to vote against the measure.

“We have industries in this state that need stability from a state policy on renewable energies,” Schultz said. “I don’t have a problem with a study into the possible effects of wind energy, but this would have thrown us into limbo again.”

Lasee’s bill was sent back to the Senate organizational committee. It is possible lawmakers may tweak the measure and bring it back to the floor.

Source:  CLAY BARBOUR | Wisconsin State Journal, host.madison.com 7 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.