LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Readers’ view: indefinitely postpone Article 44 (wind facilities) 

Credit:  Duxbury Clipper, eduxbury.com 7 March 2012 ~~

The Duxbury Alternative Energy Committee and Duxbury Wind Wise, a group of residents concerned with the responsible use of wind energy in Town are in agreement on recommending that Town Meeting indefinitely postpone Article 44, an amendment to the Wind Turbine Bylaw. On February 28, the AEC voted to discontinue its current pursuit of a wind turbine in Duxbury and to formally request that the Board of Selectmen appoint a Wind Advisory Committee to study and address the issues that have divided opinions over the past seven months on building a wind turbine in town. The committee will be comprised of members of the AEC and citizens at large including members of Duxbury Wind Wise. After months of contention over issues surrounding the potential benefits and risks of a wind turbine in Duxbury with opinions varying widely on issues such as the aesthetic impact, residential siting, height, economics, health effects and the impact on property values, we decided it was better to work together to resolve them. An additional goal of the committee will be to inform and educate both citizens and various town boards on its conclusions. To date, the AEC and the citizens on both sides of this discussion have worked hard to understand the issues surrounding wind development while often finding themselves on opposite sides of the debate. Duxbury is not alone in Massachusetts, as many cities and towns face similar debates. At our joint meeting on February 28th, we agreed that it would be important for Duxbury to take a leadership position, set its own standard and put a committee of informed citizens in place to facilitate civil dialogue seeking consensus that represents the best interests of our town. This will also enable the AEC to continue to work on its higher priority of meeting Duxbury’s renewable energy goals with solar energy.

So, it is with great conviction and resolve that we respectfully ask the citizens of Duxbury to support our cooperative effort to indefinitely postpone Article 44 at this Saturday’s town meeting.

Jim Goldenberg

Alternative Energy Committee

Chris Sherman

Duxbury Wind Wise.

Source:  Duxbury Clipper, eduxbury.com 7 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky