[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Energy subsidies total $24 billion, most to renewables  

Credit:  By Steve Hargreaves, CNN Money, money.cnn.com 7 March 2012 ~~

The federal government spent $24 billion on energy subsidies in 2011, with the vast majority going to renewable energy sources, according to a government report Tuesday.

Renewable energy and energy efficiency accounted for $16 billion of the federal support, according to the Congressional Budget Office, while the fossil-fuel industry received $2.5 billion in tax breaks.

This is a stark change from a decade ago. The CBO noted that until 2008, most energy subsidies went to the fossil-fuel industry. The idea at the time was to encourage more domestic oil production, especially when the price of oil was low.

CBO said the $24 billion total is a small fraction of the hundreds of billions the government’s various annual subsidies, which take the form of both grants and tax breaks.

The report comes amid intense debate over energy policy in Washington.
A painful cure for gas prices: Recession

The Obama administration has repeatedly called for the elimination of tax breaks for oil companies, saying the near-record profits reaped by the industry no longer justify such tax breaks.

Meanwhile, Republicans continue to be unhappy with how the Energy Department has handled some of the programs it administers, notably the loan guarantee program that funded the now-bankrupt solar-panel maker Solyndra.

Some lawmakers want federal support for renewable energy scaled back or eliminated altogether, arguing the technology is not cost competitive and the subsidies are a waste of money.

CBO noted that renewable-energy advocates argue they should be the beneficiaries of the federal support, as it will put them on an equal footing with oil and gas competitors that received so much in past subsidies.

They say that while renewable technologies may be more expensive now, federal support provides a crucial market and that, given time and economies of scale, renewable technologies will eventually be able to compete with fossil fuel.

Players in the renewable-energy sector include everyone from small manufacturers of solar panels to multi-national oil companies and investment banks.

The CBO report said tax credits for the ethanol industry totaled over $6 billion, making it the largest single renewable-energy recipient.

Ethanol tax credits usually go to refiners, which include some of the largest companies in the world like Exxon Mobil (XOM, Fortune 500), Royal Dutch Shell (RDSA) and BP (BP).

The wind industry is the second-largest recipient of government tax breaks in the renewable sector.

CBO was mostly critical of government tax breaks as a means of spurring investment in energy production.

“They are generally an inefficient way to reduce environmental and other external costs of energy,” the report said. “They often reward businesses for investments and actions they intended to take anyway.”

The report said some type of tax on dirtier fuels like oil or coal would be a better way to discourage certain energy sources and promote others. Most economists agree, but it’s a difficult sell politically. Few politicians have advocated increasing the gasoline tax, especially in an election year and with gas prices already near record highs.

The report said government support for basic energy R&D is a better investment, as businesses are reluctant to make bets on long-shot technologies but the pay-off for society when one pans out can be significant.

Source:  By Steve Hargreaves, CNN Money, money.cnn.com 7 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.