[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

New turbine plan as three others agreed 

Credit:  BY SHONA GOSSIP, The Press and Journal, 5 March 2012 ~~

Plans have been lodged for three wind turbines in an area of Aberdeenshire described last week as being at “tipping point”.

Intelligent Land Investments has submitted separate applications for the 149ft machines, which would be built on land around Laurencekirk.

The firm has also put in a proposal for a fourth turbine, of the same height, at Upper Wyndings, Fetteresso, near Stonehaven.

Last week, councillors heard pleas from community groups in the Mearns to look more closely at the cumulative impact of the turbines in the area.

Mearns Community Council secretary Marjorie Stewart told councillors there was “surely” a limit to the number of turbines a “community should be expected to absorb”.

She made the comments as members of the Kincardine and Mearns area committee approved plans for three 328ft turbines at The Shiels, Laurencekirk, near the existing Tullos windfarm.

The latest plans for land south-east of Gossesslie Farm, Upper Powburn, Fordoun and Waterlair, Fordoun have already been considered by Aberdeenshire Council’s planning team, but the developer withdrew them to revise the height of the machines.

They are now back on the table – 26ft shorter – and will be considered by the planners in the coming weeks, before councillors have their say.

Last night Mrs Stewart said the applications were far less objectionable than the one approved last week, as the electricity created would be used to power the local houses.

She said it would be for the community council to decide collectively whether to lodge an objection.

She added: “We didn’t object to them before, but that was before the three were passed last week. Since then other applications have also come up.

“This one is nothing like the 328ft ones, as they will be supporting local farmers and not just being stuck up and directed straight into the grid. However, as a community council we will have to discuss the proposal.”

Source:  BY SHONA GOSSIP, The Press and Journal, 5 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky