[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plympton-Wyoming backs turbine buffer zone 

Credit:  By PAUL MORDEN, The Observer, www.theobserver.ca 2 March 2012 ~~

If Ontario municipalities ever get back the power to approve green energy projects, Plympton-Wyoming will require that wind turbines be built at least two kilometres from neighbouring homes.

Mayor Lonny Napper said council recently voted to change the town’s zoning bylaw to reflect the new distance.

“I’m not sure,” Napper said, when asked about the municipality’s ability to enforce its new setback.

Ontario’s Green Energy Act takes zoning control over wind turbines and other renewable energy projects away from local councils. However, earlier this week Premier Dalton McGuinty said local governments will get more say over wind, solar and other green energy projects.

In 2003, the Plympton-Wyoming setbacks were established at 400 metres, Napper said.

“We wanted to update that because a lot of the companies that were coming in were making reference to that . . . although it didn’t make any difference today.”

Ontario requires a 550-metre minimum setback for wind turbines.

Plympton-Wyoming is the site of several wind farm proposals and, Napper said, “There are some that could be going soon.”

Taking into account new information received since 2003, council decided to include a 2 km setback in its zoning bylaw to be ready if control over approvals for wind projects is given back to municipalities, Napper said.

“We’re more knowledgeable about what’s going on now, than we were in 2003,” he said.

“If it ever comes back, we’re all set there.”

Esther Wrightman, a member of Middlesex-Lambton Wind Concerns, said, “I would say Plympton-Wyoming council has guts.”

She said it’s a leader on wind power issues among municipalities in northern Lambton-Middlesex.

“A lot of the councils are just removing any reference to wind turbines from their zoning bylaws,” she said.

“Plympton-Wyoming could have done that but they decided to go the other way.”

Middlesex-Lambton Wind Concerns is opposed to industrial wind turbines and is fighting development of new wind farms across the two neighbouring counties.

“I personally would like to see a health study that determined a setback to wind turbines based on real life studies, that takes into account the increasing size of turbines, and these results used to create proper setbacks for the entire province,” Wrightman said.

Along with that, she said she would like municipalities to have the power to increase the setback in their communities, but not decrease it.

“Or,” she added, “the right to say not here at all. That’s the kind of local control I’d like to see.”

Chris Forrest, vice-president of communications for the Canadian Wind Energy Association said the group believes Ontario followed “a thorough and proper process” when it set its 550 m setback.

He added Ontario’s setback is considered the most stringent in North America.

“A proposed setback of 2 km is arbitrary,” Forrest said, “and would significantly limit the ability of municipalities to realize significant localized benefits from participating in wind energy development.”

Source:  By PAUL MORDEN, The Observer, www.theobserver.ca 2 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon