[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Concern about Cape Wind, land preservation voiced at hearing on planned utilities merger 

Credit:  By JANICE PODSADA, The Hartford, www.courant.com 22 February 2012 ~~

State utility regulators heard from just two speakers Wednesday night at a public hearing on the proposed merger of Northeast Utilities and NSTAR, a Boston-based utility.

Elizabeth Gilson, representing the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, and Jim McAlister, of New Fairfield, were the only members of the public to attend the hearing held at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford. The 6:30 p.m. hearing, scheduled to end at 10 p.m., adjourned at 7:10.

In opening remarks, Kevin DelGobbo, director of the state Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, reiterated that NU must demonstrate that the merger is in the public interest and that regulators would be examining the merged company’s ability to provide “safe, reliable and adequate service.” The merger would create the largest utility in the Northeast, a $17.5 billion company serving 3.5 million customers.

Gilson, a New Haven attorney, expressed concern over a deal recently cut by Massachusetts regulators who received a long-term pledge from NU and NSTAR to purchase power from the proposed massive offshore wind power development, Cape Wind.

Gilson said the companies’ pledge to procure electricity from the Cape Wind project at a cost of nearly 19 cents per kilowatt hour was entered into without an open and competitive bidding process, which could raise rates for Connecticut customers.

The Nantucket Sound alliance opposes the Cape Wind project and claims that “far-lower-priced renewable energy resources can be obtained in Connecticut and the New England region,” Gilson told regulators.

McAlister, a member of environmental advocacy groups in the Fairfield area, urged regulators to use their authority to protect more than 9,000 acres of open-space land owned by NU in Connecticut.

The parent company of Connecticut Light & Power and Yankee Gas, NU owns 379 parcels of conservation lands throughout the state, including Vaughn’s Neck in New Fairfield, an “unspoiled stretch of peninsula that commands the water route north from Danbury to Sherman.”

McAlister said it is crucial to ensure that any merger agreement extend and further strengthen a memorandum of understanding that NU has reached with the state’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.

The memorandum, which expires in June 2014, is intended to identify and help protect environmentally sensitive property owned by the utility. McAlister urged regulators to include the continued protection of those lands beyond the June 2014 expiration date as a condition of the merger.

NU has said it has no plans to alter the document and will continue to honor it, merger or no merger.

After the hearing, DelGobbo would not say whether the two speakers’ issues are or could become conditions of the merger. Regulators are prohibited from commenting on an ongoing review. PURA has the authority to approve the merger with or without conditions. or reject it.

Representatives of NU and Consumer Counsel Elin Swanson Kartz were among the few people attending Wednesday’s hearing.

Katz said she was surprised that so few people showed up. “But perhaps that’s because they have confidence in the regulators. We continue to advocate on behalf of the ratepayers.” Katz heads the Office of Consumer Counsel, which advocates for the state’s ratepayers

PURA has said it will issue a final decision on the merger by April 2, and has been holding hearings on it with testimony from state and company officials.

To view public comments on file go to http://bit.ly/xmEi1b and click on “customer comments”

Source:  By JANICE PODSADA, The Hartford, www.courant.com 22 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon