[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind power proves expensive  

Credit:  The Herald Online, www.peherald.com 27 February 2012 ~~

Referring to the awarding “hero of the day” in The Herald of February 6, for the R93-billion wind farms plan, let the following be known:

Firstly, why so expensive? Eskom is building Medupi power station at some R125-billion for 4800Mw, so R93-billion for a mere 1850Mw is very expensive. That is R50-million versus R26-million per Mw – nearly double the price!

This will, however, in no way reduce the necessity of building more power stations, be they coal or nuclear. All that these wind turbines will do is enable Eskom to reduce the burning of coal at certain times and thus reduce carbon emissions (which is a good thing but very costly).

Wind power requires, as the name implies, for the wind to blow and it must blow fairly hard! As the average wind turbine generates power only 20% of the year do not expect too much.

We still need power for the remaining 80% of the year, hence the necessity for the coal or nuclear power stations.

There is a big difference between installed capacity (MW) and generating capacity (MWh). The wind power will have an installed capacity of 1850MW with a potential of producing 16TWh (1TWh = 1 million MWh) of energy a year, but because of the 20% usage will in fact only produce 3TWh of energy, while the Eskom power stations will have to produce the remaining 13TWh of energy.

Hence the necessity for “proper” power stations.

Anyone who believes that in 2012 wind, solar, etc. power is going to alleviate the necessity for building nuclear or coal-fired power stations does not understand how power generation and power demand works. A lot more development is required in the alternative energy field, so perhaps in 20 years’ time!

As for the creation of jobs the statement that these are largely labour intensive projects is a myth. This project will not be like building a soccer stadium.

These turbines will be spaced apart over a large area and at different sites, as has been mentioned. The construction teams will move from one turbine to the next as in a sort of production line operation.

During construction some jobs (not a lot) will be created, but not during operation when the maintenance will use a relatively small specialised labour force.

As for a third of the project costs to be spent locally, that is a laugh. The turbines themselves will be fully imported.

All that will be left is the large concrete support foundations and columns, and the transmission system. This will not come from the local community but from some large companies supplying mainly earthworks, reinforcing steel, concrete, structural steel, overhead wire, and construction equipment.

Essentially mainly unskilled labour will be sourced locally.

The ploughing of “profits” into the community is still to be seen. The companies undertaking the operation are profit oriented and need to satisfy shareholders.

Why are the costs being kept secret? That should already set alarm bells ringing? Think of Eskom and the power sale prices to special users, such as Mozal Aluminium in Maputo.

Now to the real crunch: the turbines will be a visual blot on the skyline and anyone who believes these will be aesthetically appealing has a warped sense of what is pretty. Add to that the many extra transmission lines and substations, and in a few years’ time this project will be awarded “hooligan of the day”!

An observer, Port Elizabeth

Source:  The Herald Online, www.peherald.com 27 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.