LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Campaigners take their protest to the sky 

Credit:  By Martin Neville, Isle of Wight County Press, iwcp.co.uk 23 February 2012 ~~

A helium ‘blimp’ balloon was flown to show the height of the proposed wind turbine near Carisbrooke.

Members of The Wight Against Rural Turbines (ThWART) said they wanted to illustrate the adverse impact the turbine would have on the surrounding landscape, including the nearby Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).

As previously reported, a planning application for the turbine, with a blade tip height of 81 metres (265ft), has been submitted for a site on farm land by the owners of the Great Park estate in Betty Haunt Lane.

Concerns have been voiced about the proximity of the turbine to both an AONB and local homes.

“Putting an industrial-sized turbine in this quiet rural setting and so close to residential properties is madness,” said Harriet Kent, of New Park Farm, situated 500 metres from the planned turbine.

“We are bound to be disturbed by noise, particularly at night, and also by shadow flicker from the turbine blades.”

More than 40 opponents of the proposal met in the Blacksmith’s Arms to muster support for a campaign against it.

Planning agents, Knight Frank, said the turbine would make a significant contribution to local renewable energy and was significantly smaller than typical commercial wind farms, which often exceed 125m.

In the application, landscape consultants concluded the structure would have an ‘acceptable’ impact on the countryside and there were no important breeding populations of birds affected.

Consultants, who examined the potential effect of noise on people living in 11 nearby properties, also concluded noise from the blades and turbine was ‘not a material factor’ and of the three nearest properties, within 520 metres of the turbine, only one, Pondacre Farm, would be affected by sunlight shining through the revolving blades for a total of 29.14 hours during January, February, November and December.

Source:  By Martin Neville, Isle of Wight County Press, iwcp.co.uk 23 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky