[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm supporters try to ease industry’s cost concerns 

Credit:  by Margie Hyslop, Staff Writer, www.gazette.net 24 February 2012 ~~

Three amendments to Gov. Martin O’Malley’s offshore wind farm legislation were circulating Thursday in an effort to allay industry concerns about the cost of wind-generated electricity.

One amendment would require the Public Service Commission, in evaluating whether an offshore wind project should be approved, to use the same cost standard for calculating the effect on residential and nonresidential customers, thus ensuring costs are not disproportionately shifted to industry.

Another would allow electricity suppliers to pay an alternative compliance fee of 0.1 cent for each kilowatt hour they fall short of requirements to buy offshore wind renewable energy credits (ORECs).

The third amendment would require the PSC to have open hearings to evaluate any proposed offshore wind electricity project “promptly” after an application is received.

While the provisions were enough to win support of a coalition of large industrial electricity users, members of the House Economic Matters Committee at a hearing Thursday had several more concerns for O’Malley to address.

The $2-per-month touted as a cap for the highest projected increase the PSC would allow an “average” residential user to pay is misleading because it is based on 1,000-kwh use when the monthly average is actually 1,300 kwh, Del. Sally Y. Jameson said.

Jameson (D-Dist. 28) of Bryantown reminded O’Malley she is concerned the turbines off the Atlantic Coast might cause operational changes or job losses at Patuxent Naval Air Station in Southern Maryland.

O’Malley told Jameson he has talked with the new commander at the air station, and the station’s primary concern is about land-based wind conflicts with ranges that extend over parts of the Eastern Shore.

Jameson and others said they were concerned the cost could be higher for low-income households because they are less able to make improvements that make homes more energy efficient.

O’Malley said that, during the longer term, using offshore wind energy “will be of greater benefit to families with limited means.”

Advocates tout the potential for clean energy to reduce asthma and heart attacks.

Maryland Energy Administration Director Malcolm Woolf said consumers could offset the costs of offshore wind by installing a few compact fluorescent light bulbs and lowering their water heater temperature to 120 degrees.

And a wind farm off Maryland’s coast could cut some of the roughly $4 per month that Maryland households pay in congestion charges to transmit electricity from the West, farther from high demand areas, administration officials said.

Further, the proposal would put cost-containment measures on offshore wind that never were placed on electric plants already operating in state, said Del. Tom Hucker (D-Dist. 20) of Silver Spring, who is a lead sponsor of the bill.

Still, poultry growers could be hit hard by higher rates, Del. Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio (R-Dist. 37B) of Newcomb told O’Malley.

“I’d like to meet with farmers and try to get them off the grid,” given the land resources they have, O’Malley told her.

Source:  by Margie Hyslop, Staff Writer, www.gazette.net 24 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky