[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

State’s Cape Wind-NStar agreements could end up costing consumers money 

Credit:  By Jon Chesto, Mass. Market, wickedlocal.com 18 February 2012 ~~

The Patrick administration touted this week’s NStar-Cape Wind agreements as a way for consumers to save money on electric rates. But it’s possible that we’ll actually end up spending extra money on our electricity in the long run once all the changes are calculated.

There were essentially two agreements with state agencies that were unveiled this week that will let NStar’s merger with Northeast Utilities go forward, and provide a big boost for Cape Wind Associates’ efforts to finance the 130-turbine wind farm proposed for Nantucket Sound.

One resolved a rate case in which NStar and NU agree to a short-term freeze on distribution rates and a onetime credit on electric bills. The second involves NStar’s renewable purchases, including a contract to buy 27.5 percent of Cape Wind’s power.

The onetime credits provide $21 million for NStar Electric, NStar Gas, and NU’s Western Mass. customers that will show up on bills in a month after the merger is completed. The average residential customer for NStar Electric will get $11, and the average residential NStar Gas customer will get $9, according to figures from Attorney General Martha Coakley’s office (customers who have NStar for both services will get credits for both). At NU’s Western Mass. Electric division, the average residential ratepayer would get about $7.50.

There’s the freeze on base distribution rates (a portion of your electric bill, not the whole thing) for 2013, 2014 and 2015. Coakley’s office estimates the freeze would save $50 million a year over three years for NStar’s electric customers, and $15 million each year for NStar’s gas customers. That’s a rough projection based on the increases that Coakley’s staff believes NStar would have sought. But a Coakley spokesman said he didn’t have a breakdown of what that means for a typical homeowner.

Then there’s the requirement that NStar purchase power from the Cape Wind project – power that would be priced well above the current market conditions. A spokeswoman for Gov. Deval Patrick’s environmental agencies says the estimated extra cost for a typical NStar residential customer would start at less than $1 a month over the span of NStar’s 15-year contract with Cape Wind.

The bottom line? While it’s impossible to know what will happen with energy markets 15 years from now, there’s a good chance that consumers could end up paying more for electricity as a result of these agreements by the time the contract ends.

For homeowners it might not be much. For industrial users of power, these dollars could add up quickly. That’s why Associated Industries of Massachusetts has been adamantly criticizing this NStar agreement to buy Cape Wind power (as well as a similar agreement that National Grid made in 2010 to buy half of Cape Wind’s power). AIM’s Bob Rio says the Patrick administration shouldn’t have held the NStar-NU merger hostage just to force the companies to agree to buy expensive electricity from Cape Wind.

In the end, a good argument can be made that this Cape Wind-NStar deal is a worthwhile investment in our region’s energy infrastructure – an important step to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and increase our reliance on renewable sources. But it’s much tougher to make the argument that these agreements are going to bring any sort of real savings to ratepayers.

Source:  By Jon Chesto, Mass. Market, wickedlocal.com 18 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky