Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
An ill wind blows nobody good
Credit: By Roy Jones, Morning Star, www.morningstaronline.co.uk 16 February 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Open any local newspaper in Wales these days and you’re likely to find a report on a protest against proposals to blight the landscape with hundreds more wind turbines.
They’re spreading like a rash – in people’s gardens, farmers’ fields and mountains let to transnational corporations.
They spring up across precious countryside from Pembrokeshire to the south Wales valleys, from Monmouth over the wildernesses of mid-Wales and the north.
Curbing their numbers or trying to assess the havoc wreaked is hampered by the total shambles of planning.
Power is divided between local councils, the Welsh Assembly and the British government in Westminster.
It’s a total mess with few ground rules. Planning permission granted for one turbine often allows for more. A Welsh Assembly plan limiting the number of sites means that the available sites become overloaded.
And Wales’s government is denied any power over some sites where wind-farm plans could potentially do huge damage, because authority over them lies in Westminster.
The Daily Post North Wales reported last week on “fears of the possible industrialisation of north Wales’s scenic countryside with 100 turbines set to be built in the coming months.”
It’s an absolute horror story.
It continues: “Applications to erect new giant turbines are coming in thick and fast on Anglesey.
“The majority of bids are not for large-scale wind farms but for up to three turbines.
“Forty requests for planning permission have been made in the last six months – including several for turbines standing over 330 feet.”
The report notes that the number of applications has caused alarm among Anglesey residents, many of whom fear their views will disappear.
Pressure group Anglesey Against Wind Turbines member Kate Barker said: “I strongly feel we need to adopt the one-and-a-quarter-mile setback from dwellings already adopted by many countries worldwide to protect people from harm.”
She called for an independent study to be done on the “devastating effect” that “industrial turbinisation” will have on tourism.
Anglesey MP Albert Owen, while a supporter of wind and wave energy, has admitted: “I think planning applications should be put on hold until we’ve had proper engagement on this.”
[excerpted]
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: