News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Sen. Anthony Cannella: ‘Renewable’ energy law carries a painful price tag  

Credit:  Anthony Cannella, Merced Sun-Sar, www.mercedsunstar.com 11 February 2012 ~~

Last year, Gov. Jerry Brown signed SB x2, which requires California’s utility districts to provide one-third of their total electricity from “renewable” sources by 2020. At the media event held for the signing of the more onerous Renewables Portfolio Standard program, the governor and the bill’s author, Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), spoke of how great this would be for California as a world leader.

They spoke of solar and wind as the future for energy production in the state. They said the rest of the world would see California as a shining example and emulate these standards. What they left out of their speeches was our economic reality and the effect this legislation would have on the average Californian as more wind and solar energy are required. Meeting these standards will be extremely costly, and it will ultimately be the consumer who is burdened by the high price of the implementation.

Those costs are amplified in areas such as ours. Utilities in the Central Valley will have to spend millions of dollars each year to reach RPS goals. For example, consider the impact to Merced Irrigation District ratepayers. The MID estimates it will cost an additional $30 million over the next nine years to comply with the program. That averages out to an additional $433 per customer each year.

In our current economy, those costs are too great. With so many of our friends and neighbors barely scraping by, we should be reducing the costs associated with basics such as lighting our homes and keeping our families warm.

For those on fixed incomes – not to mention struggling businesses – such increases are devastating.

Unfortunately, the political reality is that we must live with the law. However, this does not mean that we can’t improve the law and make it more affordable without reducing environmental goals.

In the implementation of the RPS program, the glaring omission of our state’s oldest renewable energy source, hydroelectric power, has resulted in large hydroelectric facilities not qualifying under the program. The power generated by these facilities is every bit as clean as the power generated by wind or the sun.

The MID obtains enough hydroelectric power from the New Exchequer Dam to supply a majority of Merced’s power needs for many years. But as the program works now, that power is ineligible and the district needs to purchase enough renewable power elsewhere to meet its RPS mandate.

It isn’t just the MID that faces this problem. For decades, irrigation districts and utilities across the state have obtained a great percentage of their electricity from the water that flows down our state’s rivers and through our dams.

There is no reason hydroelectric power facilities such as these should not be counted as a renewable energy source in RPS calculations. To address this issue, I introduced a bill last year that would have included them as a renewable resource. My colleagues in the Senate had concerns with the bill and I have worked with them to address those issues.

This year, taking their feedback into consideration, I introduced legislation that would save ratepayers hundreds of dollars annually by removing hydroelectric power from the RPS equation. SB 971 would change the program by computing RPS based on a utility’s total load, less the portion generated from large hydroelectric facilities. So if a utility district received 25 percent of the electricity it delivers to its customers from these facilities, their RPS mandate would be on the remaining 75 percent of power generated from other sources.

SB 971 would significantly reduce the costs of complying with RPS. From Merced to Turlock to Modesto, this would mean multimillion-dollar annual savings.

The fight to get this bill passed will not be an easy one. There are many special interests in Sacramento that do not care about the costs that are passed along to a struggling family or a senior on a fixed income. As your senator, I pledge to find ways to bring relief for Californians during this tough economic period. I will be doing all I can to make sure this bill is signed into law this year.

The author (R-Ceres) is the state senator from District 12.

Source:  Anthony Cannella, Merced Sun-Sar, www.mercedsunstar.com 11 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.