[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Mother’s plea to wind farm public inquiry  

Credit:  Lynn News, www.lynnnews.co.uk 9 February 2012 ~~

A mother asked a planning inspector to throw out applications for two wind farms as the Norfolk countryside is helping her son to adjust to life in this country.

Kathy Chalk told a public inquiry into two wind farms near Stanhoe and Syderstone, that her family had recently moved to South Creake from Hong Kong and the wildlife seen on their school runs help to distract her 10-year-old son.

On Friday, Mrs Chalk made an impassioned speech to inspector Robert Mellor, who will decide whether to overturn West Norfolk Council’s decision to refuse E.On and Renewable Energies (RES) planning permission to install turbines.

RES wants to build six 126.5m turbines on land at Jack’s Lane, Barwick, near Stanhoe, while E.On hopes to put up five 100m turbines on a site at Chiplow.

Six nearby residents spoke during the appeal, including Charles Butcher who supports wind farms and compared turbines to sculptures but said crops of sugar beet were “ugly”.

Mrs Chalk appealed to the inspector to protect the countryside for future generations and said she travelled through the affected villages en-route to school in Hunstanton.

She said: “He has cried in the morning. Going to school is so different and it has been a challenge to get him to school.

“We look for distractions. We look for hedgerows, flowers and birds. He has never seen them. If you take a child from an industrial built-up city like Hong Kong, a blade of grass or a hedge sparrow is actually exciting.”

Journalist and engineer Mr Butcher said that his Stanhoe home is nearest the Jack’s Lane site.

Mr Butcher, who told the hearing that he earns money from the wind industry, described turbines as “sculptural” and “as monumental as the Angel of the North” but “useful”.

But he went on to say in his speech that sugar beet uses “unpleasant” pesticides. He said: “I am not arguing with farmers’ rights to grow what they like. I personally find sugar beet ugly stuff for what it represents.”

Mr Butcher, who stated that the landscape has changed over the years due to human activity, said: “I think we have become very selfish, we think we have the right to complain about everything even though we will need the things we are objecting to.”

Stanhoe Parish Council chairman Terry Austin said villagers were extremely concerned about the impact of the Jack’s Lane development on the environment and on the tourism industry.

Barry Cox, who runs a bed and breakfast in South Creake, highlighted the results of three parish polls held in the villages, which had combined total of 80 per cent “no” votes.

He also criticised the survey by RES, which included views from people in Hunstanton, who were not affected.

Stanhoe resident Dr Roger Hargreaves said that Norfolk, with its wide horizons, was the wrong place to put a wind turbine.

Syderstone resident Reg Thompson gave a comprehensive presentation on the effect both wind farms would have on the village.

He stated that people using the footpaths would be able to see the sites and raised safety concerns about the turbines.

Mr Thompson also put forward worries about the effect of the wind farms on horse riders.

Both sites are close to the Bloodgate Iron Age Fort which is owned by Norfolk Archaeology Trust. Chairman Matthew Martin also put forward objections at the hearing.

Source:  Lynn News, www.lynnnews.co.uk 9 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.