[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

When the lights went out  

Credit:  John Burnside, New Statesman, www.newstatesman.com 5 February 2012 ~~

If there is one thing we can count on in rural Scotland, it is power cuts. In my corner of Fife, they come most often between Christmas and the turn of the year, plunging us into a regimen of coal fires and candlelight, a wild wind howling in the eaves while the children flit from room to room with torches, excited by a darkness that – because it cannot be extinguished with the simple flick of a switch – has come to seem wonderfully primeval.

This Hogmanay, the winds were particularly wild: ripping tiles from the roof, tugging down power lines and, on our hill, lifting anything that we had forgotten to bring in or batten down and carrying it off across our neighbour’s fields into what passes here for oblivion.

None of this comes as a surprise, of course. For us, winter power outages and high winds are regular events; more or less expected, oddly exhilarating periods of local mayhem. This year, however, a new feature was added to our disaster stories, as a number of the wind turbines that now cover much of southern Scotland exploded into flames, or shattered to pieces, throwing shiny, sub-aeronautic debris in all directions.

No doubt this will become a standard feature of our winter storm narratives, as more and more out-of-scale, badly sited turbines are thrown up by landowners eager to cash in on the Feed-in Tariffs.

For those of us who relish wild nature’s contempt for hubris, it may even become a regular source of grim entertainment; a reminder that, when we ignore all sense of scale and appropriateness, we pay the price. Yet we should also be concerned about the serious financial flaws in the current system – which siphons money from the poorest energy consumers into the accounts of accomplished subsidy-milkers such as big landowners – and that a renewable energy “vision” based almost exclusively on massive wind turbines (as it is in Scotland) is not only damaging to the environment but also blinds us to the potential that could be derived from more effective, appropriate-scale, less environmentally damaging technologies.
Wild etiquette

For now, those in power argue that we are only doing what we must, in order to “keep the lights burning”. Maybe I am being cynical but I can’t help thinking that keeping the lights burning is just shorthand for Business As Usual, with all the squandering of energy and abuse of the land that this has so far entailed. Yet I do think a change is necessary – and I think it will come.

As much as anything, how we generate energy must involve what Gary Snyder called “wild etiquette”, a spontaneous, instinctive code of not merely respecting but honouring and celebrating “the rest of creation”. Maybe we need to sit in the dark more often and learn to live by different kinds of light in order to see that what we are doing now is simply a continuation of the lazy and cynical mindset that got us here in the first place.

Energy generation is intricately linked with all the issues that people have been protesting about recently, from the corrupt banking system to extravagant agricultural subsidies – and it is becoming clear that we cannot carry forward corrupt and outmoded financial and design paradigms and still expect meaningful change. Yet meaningful change can be won, if we are prepared to earn it.

As Snyder notes: “A scaled-down, balanced technology is possible, if cut loose from the cancer of exploitation/heavy industry/perpetual growth . . . Electricity for Los Angeles is not exactly energy. As Blake said, ‘Energy is eternal delight’.”

Source:  John Burnside, New Statesman, www.newstatesman.com 5 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.