LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Group says rules could harm their Ogle farms; Panel pushes wind farm noise restrictions 

Credit:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.com 3 February 2012 ~~

OREGON – Will the government seek to muffle farm noise? Some say it could happen.

An agricultural leader contends an Ogle County proposal for noise restrictions on wind turbines could end up being used against farms.

Brian Duncan, Ogle County Farm Bureau president, opposes a proposed standard that would bar wind turbines from creating noise more than 5 decibels above background noise.

He said it could be used to prohibit farm activity such as grain drying.

“The courts have ruled you can’t govern one use without using the same standard for other uses. Otherwise, it’s discriminatory,” he said.

In Lee County, some attending public meetings asked the Zoning Board of Appeals to recommend a similar 5-decibel standard. The wind energy industry opposed it. The board voted 4-1 against any decibel limits, with members saying they wanted flexibility.

The zoning board’s recommendations on wind energy rules will go to the full Lee County Board, probably in the next couple of months.

Ogle County’s Zoning Board of Appeals also excluded a decibel standard. Its proposed wind energy ordinance went to the County Board’s Planning and Zoning Committee.

The committee inserted the decibel standard.

Ogle County Board member Bill Welty, a committee member, disagreed with arguments that the noise standard could be used against farmers.

“Farm [machines] don’t run 24 hours a day, 365 days a year,” he said. “The tractors in the spring and the combines in the fall are completely different from a permanent sound from a wind farm.”

As for the decibel standard, Welty said the Farm Bureau is trying “to bring something out that would be of concern to farmers that is probably not legally applicable.”

Besides, he said, state noise regulations exempt farm equipment.

Duncan said the County Board committee should have had an up-or-down vote on the Zoning Board’s proposal, not made changes to it. The committee didn’t hear the sworn testimony that took place during Zoning Board meetings and based its decisions on opinions, he said.

“We don’t think that committee has authority. It was basically Mr. Welty rigging the process,” he said. “It’s never been done that way before.”

The proposed ordinance also includes a provision requiring the distance between a turbine and a house be 1,640 feet or 3.5 times the height of the turbine, whichever is greater.

Ogle County didn’t have a setback distance before. Instead, officials said, the county deals with the issue on a case-by-case basis.

Last month, the Lee County Zoning Board voted for a setback of 1,400 feet or 3.5 times the turbine’s height, whichever is greater. Its current distance is 1,400 feet, without any provisions for the height.

Representatives of Ireland-based Mainstream Renewable Power opposed the requirement of 3.5 times the turbine’s height, saying it would discourage wind energy development. The company is planning a wind farm for Lee, Whiteside and Bureau counties.

To attend

The Ogle County Board meets at 5:30 p.m. Feb. 21 at the Ogle County Courthouse, 105 S. Fifth St., in Oregon.

The board is expected to vote on a proposed wind energy ordinance.

For an agenda for this meeting, minutes from past meetings or more information, go to www.oglecounty.org or call 815-732-1110.

Source:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.com 3 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon