LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Floyd County debates wind turbines 

Credit:  By: Morgan Donnelly | WSLS | www2.wsls.com 31 January 2012 ~~

The auditorium of Floyd County High School was packed with people ready to voice their opinions on a height ordinance; barring 40 foot structures along the ridgeline, including wind turbines. We took some concerns and research results about wind turbines to board of supervisor Virgel Allen. One was, some say the wind turbines are not cost effective.

“I have heard that but I do not know to be the truth. There is a lot of research that needs to be done,” says Allen.

Some wind farms have hundreds of turbines, and we asked Allen if turbines were allowed would that be the case here in Floyd.

“Well I have heard that it would be possibility of 20 something coming in and I don’t know that to be a fact,” says Allen.

Many people including Dave Dixon believe wind turbines are a bad idea.

“Floyd County has majestic ridge lines, its tourism was built on majestic ridge lines and to allow them to allow destruction of one ridge in this particular case with the windmills will just destroy it,” says Dixon.

Others, like Stanley Davis, disagree.

“My wife and I would like to have a windmill for our own and we have a hill we would like to put one,” says Davis.

Jim Woltz, with Woltz Real Estate, worries a ban on structures prevent building silos and barns.

“They didn’t ask for an ordinance that would take property rights away. I am not for the windmills but I am for property rights,” says Woltz.

With no decision made at the hearing, wind turbines will continue to be the talk of the town.

Source:  By: Morgan Donnelly | WSLS | www2.wsls.com 31 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky