LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

FAA accused of fast-tracking wind farm 

Credit:  www.aero-news.net 31 January 2012 ~~

The FAA has cleared development of a 64-turbine wind farm west of Pratt Regional Airport in Kansas. But the Pratt County Zoning Board is left scratching its collective head after a former FAA employee who’s also a commercial pilot, flight instructor, and expert witness in 60 lawsuits says the FAA screwed up, and building the wind farm could leave the county liable for aviation accidents.

The Pratt Tribune reports that on Monday evening, Don Hensley of Safe Sky, LLC told the board that the the FAA didn’t follow its own procedures in approving the project, (file photo shown) which he says will put 23 of the 64 turbines unacceptably close to flight paths. From procedural standpoint, Hensley says procedure should have required review by the airport board and the community as a whole. He adds the agency should have supplied an analysis of evidence the turbines could interfere with VFR and IFR flight, and even misinterpreted its own regulations regarding response to a petition against the project submitted by pilots.

Hensley concluded that unless the zoning board stops the project, the landowners, developer, and county could be found liable in an accident. A county attorney disagreed, saying as long as the board acts reasonably, the county should be off the hook.

Hensley blamed FAA office consolidation for a rushed process, and told the zoning board it should take the FAA to court.

Source:  www.aero-news.net 31 January 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky